Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mrs. Mudra G. Nanavati Vs. the Dcit

Decided On : May-23-2008

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 158BC, Section 132 of the Act, Section 158BC, Section 143(2, Section 158 BC of the Act, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 15BBC, Section 143(2, Section 158 BC, Section 158 BA, Section 158BC.4, Section 113(2, Section 143(2, Section 142, Section 143 (Section 144 and Section 145, Section 158BC, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 113(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 158BC(b, Section 158BC, Section 142(1, Section 158BC and Section 143(3, Section 143(2, Section 142, Section 142(1, Section 143(2, Section 143, Section 158BC, Section 142, Section 143, Section 158BC(b, Section 148, Section 158BC, Section 142, Section 143, Chapter XIV, Section 143(2, Section 142, Section 143(2, Section 158BC(a, Chapter XIV-B., Section 142, Section 143(2, Section 158BC, Section 143, Section 143(2, Chapter XIV-B, Section 158BC(a, Section 143, Section 143, Section 142(1, Section 158BC, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 14-1(2, Section 143(2, ITR 29, Section 12, Section 140(3, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 37(1, Section 165, Section 165, Section 143(2, Section 143(2

CARDINAL: 1, 26/11/03, 1/4/90, 1, 24/8/2000, 3/10/2000, 23/2/01, 289, 28, 1, 27/7/07, 506, 2, 29/8/2007, 237, 317, 3, 81, 4, 26/9/07, 631, 3, 206, 209, 277, 1, 155, 166, two, 7, 6.6.2000, 2, 3, 8., 9, 289, 10, 2 to 8, 155, 11, 12, 13, 143(2, 14, 155, 166, 15, 289, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 16, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 17, 18, 111, under - 3, 81, 362, 87, 4., 5., 69, 650, 6., one, one, 9, 107, 209, 198, 10, one, two, 11, 13, two, two, two, 14, 177, 68, two, one, four, 15, 137, 635, 16, Two, two, one, two, 7

DATE: 24/8/2000.2, 12-months, 1/2/01, 10/2/01, 12 months, the expiry of 12 months, 21/3/2007, 75, 12 months, a period of, one year, the end of the month, 30.6.2001, 22.10.2001, 30.6.2001, the expiry of 12 months, the end of the month, 1961, the financial year, six months, the end of the month, one year, 2003, 2003, 2000, a little later, 1992, 1992, 1973, 1973, one year

GPE: Ground, A.O., A.O., A.O., Mumbai, Delhi ITAT's, DR, the ITAT Delhi, D.R., D.R., Lorships, SB, India, India, India, India, Bombay, India, the State of Bombay, A.O., Mumbai, Delhi, India, Mumbai, India, States

TIME: 12/4/02 i.e.

ORG: Smt, CIT, Tribunal, Vin Vish Corporation P. Ltd., Atul Glass Industries Ltd, Smt, Aurangabad Holiday Resorts, 701 &amp, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, the Mumbai Benches of ITAT, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, Hon'ble Bombay High Court, Thane Electricity Supply Ltd., ITR, Consolidated Pneumatic Tools Co., Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, the Mumbai Benches, Tribunal, Naval Kishore &, Sons Jewellers v. DCIT 265 ITR, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, The Hon'ble Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Bhavnagar University, Palilana Sugar Mill Ltd., The ITAT Mumbai, M/s Vin Vish Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Hon'bie, Tribunal, The Learned Counsel, the Assessing Authority, Assessing, the Proviso to Clause (ii, the Gauhati High Court, Smt, Court, the Supreme Court, Enforcement and Ors, Court, the Supreme Court, the ITAT Delhi Bench, Action Electronics v. DCIT, Electronica Components v., ITA No 5216/Delhi/96, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, Delhi Tribunal, the Proviso to Section 143(2, the Supreme Court, Enforcement and Ors, Court, the Directorate of Enforcement, The Gauhati High Court, Smt, Court, Court, Assessing, Assessing, Court, the Supreme Court, CIT, the Supreme Court, The Gauhati High Court, Assessing, Assessing, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Assessing, Board, Assessing, the Gauhati High Court, Assessing, the Gauhati High Court, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, Mumbai Benches, ACIT, TTJ 741.wherein, Tribunal, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, Smt, Tribunal, Tribunal, Hon'ble Bombay High Court, CIT, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd., Learned Departmental Representative, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd.'s, Tribunal, Nawal Kishore &, Sons Jewellers, CIT, TTJ, Lucknow, SB, ITD 407, Tribunal, Kishore &, Sons, Tribunal, Tej International (P) Ltd., CIT, TTJ, Court, Tribunal, Bench, CIT, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd.(supra, Departmental Representative, the High Courts, High Courts, Court, Court, the High Court, Lordships, the High Court, Division Bench, Lordships, Court, Court, Sarafs, Hon'ble High Court, Revenue, Follows., another High Court, Tribunal, Lordships, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Lordships, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, Sun Engineering Works, CTR, SC, SC, Court, Court, the High Courts, another High Court, High Court's, another High Court, Tribunal, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd, the Hon'ble High Court, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd.(supra, ITO, Tribunal, Hon'ble High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, State, Tribunal, the High Court, State, High Court, the Hon'ble High Court, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd's, Lordships, Tribunal, High Court, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd's, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd's, Hon'ble Court, Departmental Representative, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd., decision(supra, Thana Electricity Supply Ltd.'s, Tribunal, CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., CTR, SC, SC, Hon'ble Bombay High Court, Hon'ble Punjab &, Haryana High Court, v. Union of India, CIT, Tej International (P) Ltd., Hon'ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, M/s Vin Vish Corporation Ltd., the Customs Authorities, CRPC, CRPC, Customs, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CRPC, the Court of law, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, Smt, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, the Jurisdictional High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, Arvind Boards &amp, Paper Products Ltd, CIT, Straw-Board Mfg.Co. Ltd., another High Court, the Bombay High Court, Maneklal Chunilal &amp, Sons Ltd., CIT, CIT, Dalai &amp, This High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, this High Court, CIT, Garden Silk Weaving Factory, the Bombay High Court

PERSON: Bandana Gogoi, Anr, Delhi ITAT's, Krishna Verma v. ACIT, Pratap Singh, Bandana Gogoi, Partap Singh, Anr, Partap Singh, Anr, Bandana Gogoi, Bandana Gogoi, Godavaridevi Saraf, Bench, Godavaridevi Saraf, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Godavandevi, Lordships, Lordships, Godavaridevi Saraf, Godavaridevi Saraf, Benches of, Godavaridevi Saraf, Godavaridevi Saraf, Lordships, A.M. Sali Maricar, Anr, Anr, Lordships, Godavandevi Saraf's, Godavaridevi Saraf's, Godavaridevi Sarf's, Lordships Judgment, Godavaridevi Saraf's, Godavaridevi Saraf's, Hon'ble Karnataka High Court, Patil Vijaykumar, Anr, Ved Prakash, Benech, Pratap Singh, Enforcement, Pratap Singh, Bandana Gogoi, Chandigarh

LOC: Gauhati, Section 158BB, Madras

MONEY: 79/Del/2003

NORP: Pune ITAT's, R., ITAT, ITAT, ITAT

PRODUCT: 727, Section 158BC, Section 158BB, Section 158BC, a Full Bench, Bench

WORK_OF_ART: A Division Bench, Bench

ORDINAL: first, First, Secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //