Semantic Analysis by spaCy
S. Zoraster and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Mar-17-2009
Court : Rajasthan
LAW: Section 144B of the Act, Section 45, Section 14, Section 10(3, Section 56, Section 45, Section 48, Section 45, Section 56, Section 10(3, Section 56
ORG: Court, Tribunal, Cinema, JMDSPL, JMDSPL, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Supreme Court, Travancore Rubber & Tea Co. Ltd, ITR, CIT, D.P. Sandu Bros., Travancore Rubber & Tea Co. Ltd. ', the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, D.P. Sandu Bros., The Supreme Court, CIT, SC, CIT, SC, the Supreme Court
DATE: 1961, year 1974-75, 2005, 1972, 1966
CARDINAL: 20,000, 2, 30-12-1968, 17, 15, 7, 20,000, 20,000, two, 2000, 243, 158, 109, 250, 273, 1, 142, 83, 61, 432, 435, 10, 20,000
PERSON: Prem Prakash Talkies, Counsel, Chembur, Chembur, S. G. Mercantile Corporation, Ambalal Mody v. S.A.L Narayan Row, Counsel, Counsel
GPE: Clause, assessee
PRODUCT: 713.8