Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Himmat Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Decided On : Nov-15-1994

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 173(2, Section 437 Cr., Section 37 of the NDPS Act, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 167(2, Section 173(8, Section 167(2, Section 173, Section 173, Section 170 Cr., Section 173 Cr., Section 161, Section 173 Cr., Section 161 Cr., Section 173 Cr. P. C., Section 173(2, Section 167, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 173, Section 173, Section 173, Section 173, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 173(8, Section 173 of the 1898 Code, Section 173 nor Section 190, Section 173(2, Section 37 of the Act, the NDPS Act

PERSON: Arora, Ram Lal Narang v. The State

NORP: J.1, Jericans

CARDINAL: one, 14, 18 and 25, 19-3-94, two, five, 20, 2, 5, 5, 2, 2, one, 8), 41, 2, 6, 1979CriLJ1346, ten

ORG: Tapsu, FIR, Police Station, Pratabgarh, Sections 8/12, 8A, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Motbir, Tapsu, Magistrate, FSL, FSL, FSL, Public Prosecutor, the Officer Incharge of, Magistrate, the State Government, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, FSL, FSL, Magistrate, Court, the Law Commision, the Law Commission, Magistrate, Courts, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Apex Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, FSL, FSL, Court

DATE: 8/18, 1985, 1973, 2).'It

PRODUCT: Anhydride, 41-Report, Anhydride

ORDINAL: first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //