K.G. Hotel Pvt. Ltd., 1967 Vs. Acit

Decided On : Jan-15-2008

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

LAW: Section 139 of the Act, Section 142(1, Section 143(3, Section 139, Section 148, Section 148, Section 147, Section 148, Section 143(3, Section 143(3, Section 144, the I.T. Act, Section 143(3, Section 143(3, Section 251, the I.T. Act, Section 143(3, Bidhu 63, Section 142 of the Act, Section 143(2, Section 147 of the Act, Section 142, Section 139, Section 142, Section 139(4, Section 14 2, Section 144, the Explanation 2 Clause, Section 148, Section 147, Section 143, Section 139, Section 142 or Section 148, Section 143, Section 139, Section 142 or Section 148, Section 142, Section 139(4, Section 147, Section 147(a, Section 144, Section 68, Section 68, Section 143(1, Section 147, Section 147.Inspite, Section 148

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 16.10.89, 8.1.1992, 31.12.1993, 30.3.1994, 23,72,180/-, 3, 31.3.93, 21,91,900/-, 24,53,900/-, 31.12.1993, 31.12.1993, 30.3.1994, 31.12.93, 103, 437, 552, 96, 6.12.95, two, 31.12.93, 103(MP, 352, 103, 269, 307(SC, 17, 278, 157, 103, 176, 352, 103, 437, 51, 110, 2, 103, 3, 4, 171, 5, 1, 1, 31-3-1993, 31-12-1993, 31-12-1993, 91, 31.3.93, 91 92, 153, 148, 153, 3, 1, 153, 3, 1, 1, 8, 21,91,900/-, 19, two, two, 1.82, two, three, 500, 258, 709, 41, 63, 278, 103, one

ORG: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Judicial, 31.3.1993, Supreme Court, ITO, Lakhman Mewal Das, ITR, Calcutta High Court, Santosh Debi Band v. ITO, CIT, ITR, Supreme Court, Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, AC, Assessing, the M.P. High Court, Yeshwant Talkies, CIT, the Patna High Court, ITO, ITR, ITR, Judicial, AO, CIT, Narsee, SC, ITO, SC, CIT, ITR, ITA, ITO, Assessing, AO, Department, Department, Calcutta High Court, Smt, Santosh Bedi Baid v. ITO, Punjab High Court, CIT, Tribunal, Smt, the Supreme Court, ITO, SC, Assessing, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, CIT, ITR, The Learned CIT-D.R, the Learned Judicial, Smt Santosh Debi Baid, Calcutta High Court, Clauses, Explanation, Assessing, Assessing, Sections 148, Sections 148, Assessing, the Supreme Court, CIT v. Bedi and Co. Pvt, Mandya National Paper Mills, Supreme, United Electric Co. Pvt, ITR, AO, AO, AO, the Delhi High Court, AO, The High Court, CIT 27, the Supreme Court, the Income Tax Authorities, ITR, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, ITO, SC, CIT, ITR, ITO, ITR, MK, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Capital, Assessing, Judicial

ORDINAL: Third, second, first, second, first, firstly, secondly

DATE: The Assessment year, 1991-92, 30 days, 30 days, 24,53,900/-, 1991-92, 1975, 1268, 24,53,900/-, year 1991-92, 1991-92, year 1991-92, 1991-92, 1961, the year, 54, 14, one year, one year, the year, the previous year, year, year, four years, the assessment year, four years, 4 years, December 5, 1961, the assessment year 1960-61, year ended on May 31, 1959, November 15, 1958, November 25, 1968, 32, 58, December 2, 1970, any previous year, 28, 1991-92

GPE: A.Y., A.O., A.Y., A.Y., A.Y., A.Y., Gemini, thereon, invalid.6, A.Y., A.Y., A.O., Esthuri, regard.10, A.Y., A.Y., Sections, Kaneshwar v. State of Bihar 37, dispute.26, Esthuri, A.Y.

PRODUCT: 31.12.93, 31.12.93, Bidhu

WORK_OF_ART: 30.3.1994, 31.12.93

PERSON: Hon'ble Madras High Court, T.R. Rajkumari, Girdhar Gopal Gulati, invalid.7, Chatturam Hariram Limited, Kaneshwar v. State of, Yeshwant, Sheo Narain Jaiswal, Lakhamani Mewal Das, Y.K. Kapoor, Bibi Gurdarshan Kaur, Pun, Kirshna Verma v. ACIT 107 ITD 1, Sarla Kumari, Bibi Gurdarshan Kaur, Loans, Chatturam Hariram Limited, of.27, Lakhamani Mewal

FAC: Sheo Narain Jaiswal