Cit Vs. Shree Rajasthan Syntex Limited

Decided On : May-06-2008

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 147/148, the Income Tax Act, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32, Section 147, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32, Section 147, Section 147(1, Income Tax Act

PERSON: N.P. Gupta, Shree Rajasthan Syntex Limited, Udaipur, under:147, George Williamson, Anr, Sheth Brothers, ICICI, Goculdas, Balance Sheet, Lessee

NORP: J.1, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, Central Excise

CARDINAL: four, one, three, 13, four, four, 23, two, three, 13, one, 2, three, four, three, 22.12.2003, 23, 2001- 02, 18.10.2005, 18.10.2005, four, 22.12.2003, two, three, 147, 148, assets.13, two, 148, 153, 17, one, 258, 2, 2002]258ITR533(Cal, 3, 1996]222ITR68(Guj, 4, 1998]234ITR170(Delhi, 5, 1980]121ITR368(Bom, 6, 1999]237ITR668(Guj, 7, 2002]254ITR791(SC, 8, 270, 10, 256, 1, three, 2, 4, 9, 15, more than one, 1500, two, 2002]254ITR98(SC, 2, 1998]231ITR308(SC, 3, 2002]254ITR83(Mad, 4, 2002]254ITR445(Mad, 5, 2001]247ITR25(Delhi, 6, 1998]233ITR172(Bom, 7, 48, 51, 264.25, 1977]1SCR118, 8, 2, 4

DATE: 70, 50, 13.03.2007, monthly, years 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99, the assessment year 2001-02, three assessment years being 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99, year 2001-02, years 1996-97 and, 1997-98, the assessment years 1996-97 and, 1997-98, 50 of 2007, 22.12.2003, the year 1998-99, 22.12.2003, 13.07.2006, Para 6, 13.07.2006, years 1996-97 and, 1997-98, the assessment year, 2002, 2001, 2002, 1 18, 12, 13, 16, 17, 27, 29, Para 18, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, Para 42, the relevant year, years, 1994, 5318, 1995, Para 17, the last half a century, 1961

GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Counsel, Counsel, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai

ORG: the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, High Courts, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sections 148, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT (Assessment, Ors, Mercury, Travels Ltd., Garden Silk Mills Ltd., Jindal Photo Films Ltd., CIT, CIT v. Hickson & Dadajee Ltd., Garden Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., CIT v. Corporation Bank Ltd., Joint CIT, CIT, Sambhar Salt Ltd., CIT, Kelvinator of India Ltd., Garden Silk Mills Ltd., Jindal Photo Films Ltd., Assessing, Assessing, Tribunal, Clauses 4, Tribunal, the Memorandum of Association, Stock Exchange, the Board of Directors, Tribunal, Central Excise Rules, Tribunal, CIT, Maharashtra Apex Corporation Ltd., CIT, CIT, Essan Investments Ltd., CIT, Madan & Co., Anatronics General Co., CIT v. Rensult Investment & Finance P. Ltd., CIT, TTJ, Peacock Chemicals Pvt, CIT, TTJ, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, Shaan Finance's, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Damodar Valley Corporation, The State of Bihar, Court, Corporation, Court, simpliciter.26, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Shaan Finance's

LOC: Act.12

ORDINAL: secondly, second, first

PRODUCT: Central Excise Gate-

WORK_OF_ART: Shaan Finance