Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sukhpal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided On : Feb-02-1998

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Order 7, Rule 11, Section 53, Section 88, the Tenancy Act', Order 7, Rule 11, Section 230, Section 221, the Tenancy Act, Section 239, Section 2(g, the Indian Contract Act, the Contract Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 11, Section 5, Section 23, the Contract Act, Section 23, the Contract Act, Section 23, the Contract Act, Order 11, Order 7, Rule 11, Order 7, Rule 11, Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 28, the Registration Act, Order 7, Rule 11

PERSON: ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J. 1, Gurdev Kaur, Ishar Singh, tehsil, Sri Ganganagar, Ishar Singh, Gurdeo Kaur, Tehsildar, Will, Will, Will, himself;(vi, Will, under:--, Will, H. Section Sidhu, Will, Singh, Dhanyalakshmi Rice Mills, Appa Rao v. G. Ramahngamurthi, ManagingMember, Yamuna Bai Anantrao Adhav, Shivram Adhav, Nawab Khan, Abbas, Khan, Ridge, G. Annamalai Pillai v., ML K. Kunhikannan, Gurudayal Kaur, Rajasthan 91, Badri Lal v. Moda, Ram Avalamb v. Jata Shanker, Ningawwa, Byrappa Shiddappa Hireknrabar, Dularia Devi v. Janardan Singh, Abdul Wahid Khan v. Bhawani, Bismillah, Janeshwar Prasad, Sidhu, Jasveer Kaur v. Sukhdeo, Amir Mohammed v., Gafoor Mohammed Khan, Will, Sidhu, Will, Ishar Singh, Ishwar Singh, Will, Shri Ishar, Will

CARDINAL: 29-11-1992, 2, 31, 2., 3, 4, 12-11-1987, 3, 3, 15-3-1987;(iv, 30-11-1987, 3, 1/3, 1/3, 3., 31, 2, 29, 3, 3, 28 and 29, one, 297, 165, 569, 1420).11, 1, 530, 1955.12, 2, 10, 2, 16, 1, 435, 3).18, 526, two, 325, 326, 53 and 88, 170, 3

ORG: the Board of Revenue, theRevenue Authority, Annexure-P.2, the Revenue Authority, Revenue Authority, C.P.C. Moreover, the Revenue Authority, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, Annexure-P.2, the Board of Revenue, a Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Revenue Court, the Civil Court, the Tenancy Act.7, Courts, AIR 1949, Kalyanpur Lime Works Ltd., State of Bihar, SC, Civil Supplies, AIR 1976, SC, AIR 1962, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Perumalakkal v. Kumaresan, AIR 1967, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, C.A. Muruganatha Mudaliar, AIR 1953 SC 495, S.R. Nayak v. Union of India, AIR 1991, AIR 1988, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, AIR 1975 SC, the Supreme Court, Courts, AIR 1971, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Joint Hindu Family, AIR 1974 SC 1471, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the House of Lords, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR SCW, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, State, AIR 1996, the Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 1977 SC 2421, Court, Court, Court, Court, Das, AIR, Court, Court, the Civil Court, Allahabad High Court, AIR 1969 Allahabad, the Revenue Court, a Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, AIR1996, the Civil Court, the Revenue Court, the Apex Court, AIR 1968 SC 956, AIR 1990, The Apex Court, the Civil Court, AIR 1966, the Apex Court, a Civil Court, a Civil Court, Court, AIR 1990, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Board of Revenue, RRD, a Revenue Court, a Civil Court, the Revenue Court, the Board of Revenue, Court, RRD, Court, a Revenue Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court

DATE: 1955, 21-5-1988, March, 1987, 1/3share, 1872, 23, 26, 27, 1954, 1988, 1956, 1223, '13, 1963, 66, '15, 1993, 1993, 2618, 1996, 1173, '22, 1993, 1988

NORP: Punjab, Hindu, Raghubachamani

LOC: Tehsildar

GPE: Chandra, Clause, Singh, Gujarat, Kerala, C.P.C., T. Arivandandam v., C.P.C., Gurucharan, Singh v. Mst, case.19, Singh v. District Judge, Singh, C.P.C.

EVENT: SC 644, SC 906

PRODUCT: 776, the Full Bench of

ORDINAL: first

QUANTITY: 3-plaintift

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //