Semantic Analysis by spaCy
ito Vs. Dr. Bobby Anand Chaurasia
Decided On : Aug-31-2007
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
LAW: Section 147.3, Section 10(13A, Section 10(73A).4, Section 119 of Income Tax Act, Section 119, Section 119(1, Section 119, the Income Tax Act
CARDINAL: 1, 03.2, 21,500, 2, 2, 24, 5,400, 54,000.A, 54,000, 54,000, 21,500, one, 2, 2, 24, 10-3-2006, 2, 276, One, 2, 2, 2, 27-3-2000, 100, 24, 2, 2, 27-3-2000, 50,000, 24, 24, 27-3-2000, 1, 27-3-2000, 94, 28-3-2000, 8, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 17, 1961.9, 2, 2, 24
GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, Courts
DATE: 10-5-2007, the assessment year 2002, 10 months, the year, year, 2002, decades, 2006, 31 -10-2005, 2005, 1979
ORG: HRA, CBDT Circular, HRA, HRA, ICICI Bank, Connaught Place, Kalawati, SBI, Paschim Vihar, Departmental, CBDT, Bench, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, Tribunal, Bombay High Court, Pilhwa Engg, Board, Court, Board, Board, CIT, Rajoo Engineers Ltd., ITD 555, CIT, the High Court, The High Court, CBDT, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, The Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Appellate Tribunal, Board, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts, the Supreme Court, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, ITO, ITD 164 (Asr., Supreme Court, CBDT, CBDT, Board, the Commissioner (Appeals, Board, the Board under Section 119(2, CBDT, Supreme Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Tanna &, CIT, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CA, CBDT Circular, dismissed.10, CO
PERSON: Shri Alok Kumar, Delhi Bench, Vikram Bhatnagar, Pithwa Engg, Circular F. No, Bir Engg, Modi
NORP: Hon'ble
WORK_OF_ART: Shri Manoj Garg