Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kamal Mishra Vs. Ito
Decided On : Aug-31-2007
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
LAW: Section 143(3, the Income Tax Act, Section 23, Section 23(1)(a, Section 23(1)(a, Section 23(1)(a, Section 22, Section 23(1)(a, Section 22, Section 23 of the Act, Section 2(2A)(c, Section 22, Section 48, the Income Tax Act, Section 48, Section 23(1)(c, the Income Tax Act, Section 23(1, Section 22, the Finance Act, Section 23(1)(a, Section 23, Section 23(1)(c, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 22, Section 2(2A)(c
CARDINAL: 1, 5, 1961.2, four, 1)(c, 37,42,800, 26,19,960, 2, 1, 8, 31-3-2002, 1, 36,00,000, 2, 3, 1,20,000, 4, 401, 403, 1, 2, 1-4-2002, 8, two, one
ORG: Commissioner (Appeals, Haridwar, ALV, ALV, ALV, ALV, ALV, Haridwar, The Commissioner (Appeals, ALV, the Commissioner (Appeals, Commissioner (Appeals, ALV, Commissioner (Appeals, Mool Chand, CIT, ALV, Dhanvarsha, Farm House, the Commissioner (Appeals, Authorized Representative, Act.10, the Commissioner (Appeals
DATE: the assessment year 2002-03, December 2000, April 2000, the previous year, annual, the year, annual, year 2002-03, January 1998, the year, the year, the year, December, 2000, annual, year 2002-03, the date of year, the base year, 1961, annual, the previous year, annual, 2001, annual, December, 2000, April 2002, the base year, the year, 1997-98, The base year, the year
FAC: Vasant Vihar, Vasant Vihar, Vasant Vihar, Sadhu Bela, Vasant Vihar, Village Masudpur
GPE: Delhi, Haridwar, Haridwar, New Delhi, Haridwar, Haridwar, Dharmashala, New Delhi, assessee, Haridwar, Masudpur, Delhi, New Delhi, Haridwar, Clause, New Delhi, assessee
MONEY: 30 per cent
PERSON: house.4, Masudpur, Mahesh Chand, Masudpur, Sadhu Bela, Vasant Vihar, H.C. Misra