Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kamal Mishra Vs. Ito

Decided On : Aug-31-2007

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: Section 143(3, the Income Tax Act, Section 23, Section 23(1)(a, Section 23(1)(a, Section 23(1)(a, Section 22, Section 23(1)(a, Section 22, Section 23 of the Act, Section 2(2A)(c, Section 22, Section 48, the Income Tax Act, Section 48, Section 23(1)(c, the Income Tax Act, Section 23(1, Section 22, the Finance Act, Section 23(1)(a, Section 23, Section 23(1)(c, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 22, Section 2(2A)(c

CARDINAL: 1, 5, 1961.2, four, 1)(c, 37,42,800, 26,19,960, 2, 1, 8, 31-3-2002, 1, 36,00,000, 2, 3, 1,20,000, 4, 401, 403, 1, 2, 1-4-2002, 8, two, one

ORG: Commissioner (Appeals, Haridwar, ALV, ALV, ALV, ALV, ALV, Haridwar, The Commissioner (Appeals, ALV, the Commissioner (Appeals, Commissioner (Appeals, ALV, Commissioner (Appeals, Mool Chand, CIT, ALV, Dhanvarsha, Farm House, the Commissioner (Appeals, Authorized Representative, Act.10, the Commissioner (Appeals

DATE: the assessment year 2002-03, December 2000, April 2000, the previous year, annual, the year, annual, year 2002-03, January 1998, the year, the year, the year, December, 2000, annual, year 2002-03, the date of year, the base year, 1961, annual, the previous year, annual, 2001, annual, December, 2000, April 2002, the base year, the year, 1997-98, The base year, the year

FAC: Vasant Vihar, Vasant Vihar, Vasant Vihar, Sadhu Bela, Vasant Vihar, Village Masudpur

GPE: Delhi, Haridwar, Haridwar, New Delhi, Haridwar, Haridwar, Dharmashala, New Delhi, assessee, Haridwar, Masudpur, Delhi, New Delhi, Haridwar, Clause, New Delhi, assessee

MONEY: 30 per cent

PERSON: house.4, Masudpur, Mahesh Chand, Masudpur, Sadhu Bela, Vasant Vihar, H.C. Misra

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //