State of Rajasthan Vs. Shri Sunder Das

Decided On : Apr-13-1972

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article 102 of the Limitation Act, Rule 54, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311, Article 311 of the Constitution.11, Article 311 of the Constitution.12, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 309 of the Constitution, Rule 54 of the Rajasthan Service Rules, Rule 54, Article 102, Article 102, Article 103 of the Indian Limitation Act, Article 102, Order 2, section 240, Article 102, Article 102, the Railway Establishment Code, Article 102 of the Limitation Act, Article 102

ORG: J.P. Jain, State, the Agriculture Dept, State of Ajmer, the Agriculture Department, Government, The District Agriculture Officer, the State of Rajasthan, State, State, Government, Uttar Pradesh and Ors, one.7, the Agriculture Department, the Government Rajasthan, the Ajmer Government, Government, Compost Mistry, Central Civil Services, the Rajasthan Service Rules, the Government Servant, F.D. Notification, Government, the State Government, the Agricultural Officer, Finance, the Agricultural Officer, Finance, Government of Ajmer, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, Government, Government, SC, Lordships, Govt, Government, an Appellate Authority, Supreme Court, Tehsildar, the State Government, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, Tehsildar, the High Court at Allahabad, The High Court, the Board of Revenue, the Civil Court, H)58, The High Court, the Board of Revenue, Government, The High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, State Government, the State of U., the Fundamental Rules, the State Government, State, Lordships, the State Government, the High Court, Sundardas, the Rajasthan Service Rules, the Supreme Court, the State Government, the Supreme Court, the Federal Court, State, the Supreme Court, Uttar Pradesh, Court, a Civil Court, Court, Fundamental Rule 32, the Supreme Court of India, Union of India 1970, the Union of India, the Government of India Act, the High Court of Punjab, Court, Counsel, State, Fundamental R. 52, Fundamental Rule 52, Court, The High Court, Learned Counsel, Division Bench, Supreme Court

NORP: J.1, Biney

ORDINAL: second, 24th, second, second, second, second, third, second, third

CARDINAL: 37/61, 2016.24, 18.3.54, 31,3.1965.2, 30.4.1952, 19 5.1954, 2016.94, 1.5.52, 18.5.54, 1961.3, 24 2.1960, two, 19-5-1954, 24, 24-6-60, arrear, two, 24, 30-4-1952, 19, two, 62, 212, 26-11-62, 212, 1, 18, 1, 30-4-52, 1, one, 462, 19.5 54.13, 24.2.60, 21.4 52, 16.3.53, 16.9.53, 1/-, 1/-, 24 2-60, 1982CriLJ150, 1908.15, 1963)IILLJ584Mad, 142, 1, 2, 3, 2, II, 20, 1, 16, 3-4-1961, two

LOC: the District Judge, Madras

DATE: 10 5.1948, one month's, February, 11st May, 1952 to, 18th May, 1954, 1st July, 1954, 10.4 1960, 3rd July, 19.5 1954, 1st May, 1952 to, 18th May, 1954, 24 2, 2016 94, 4 4 1961, a particular month, 1962)ILLJ266SC, one month's, one month's, 30th April, 1952, 10-5 54, 19 5-45, 30th April, 1952, 30th April, 1952, 19th May, 1954, 19th May, 1954, May, 1952 to, 18th May, 1954, 1st May, 1952 to, 18th May, 1954, 29th May, 1951, 1st July 1954, 1st May, 1952 to, 18th May, 1954, 6-8-1963, 54, 24 2-1960, 20th June, 1952, 21st April, 1952, 1971, 1.5 1952, 1962)ILLJ266SC, 28.4.1959, April 21, 1952, 21st April, 1952, April 211, 1952 to, November 24, 1954, November 24, 1954 to April, three years, 1947 FC 23, S.C. 1334, 1971, three years, two months, 1935, three years, three years, 1963 Mad 1014, month, month, 2042, the end of every month, month, month, the plaintiff month after month

TIME: the afternoon

GPE: Rajasthan, F.D., Gagwana, Madhav, Punjab Province v., I.R.

PRODUCT: Sunderdas, Shri Sundardas, Rule 54 of the Fundamental Rules

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Sundar Das, State of Madhya Pradesh

PERSON: Ajmer, Ex-A-4, Ajmer, Shrimal, Shri J.P. Joshi, A-4, Devendra Pratap Narain Sharma, Counsel, Shri Ainani, Sundardas T. Ainani, Ajmer, Ajmer, Ram Gopal Chaturvedi v. State, I.N. Saksena, Mukherjee v. State of, Law, Devandar Pratap Narain, A-4, Devendra Pratap Narain, Devendra Pratap Narain, Devendra Pratap Narayan, Devendra Pratap Narayan, i. e. 24-12-54, Salary, Madras, Anantharaman, Davendra Pratap V. State, Anr, Ratanlal Sogani, Bhargava J., Jaichand Sawhney, Hissar, Madras, A.V. Anantharaman, i. e., barred.16

PERCENT: 6%, 6%

EVENT: the Railway Establishment Code