Jai Glasskow Vs. Commercial Taxes Officer

Decided On : May-18-2007

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 8(1, Section 8(3)(b, Section 10A, Section 10A, the CST Act, Article 323B, Section 10F(8, Section 10F., Section 10F, Section 10A, Section 10F, Section 10A

PERSON: Vineet Kothari, Gogra, R.B. Mathur, Tamil Nadu, Gogra, Udaipur v. Rajasthan Taxchem Ltd., Counsel, Counsel

NORP: J.1

ORG: the Tax Board, the Tax Board, the Central Sales Tax Act, Tax Board, the Tax Board, Koodal Industries Limited, the Central Sales Tax Act, The Allahabad High Court, Micro Abressive India Limited, the Allahabad High Court, The West Bengal Taxation Tribunal, the High Court, Supreme Court, Commercial Taxation, V.A.T., Learned Counsel, Counsel, Court, Taxes, C.T.O., Alcobex Metal Corporation, SLP, Supreme Court, Court, Madras High Court, the Allahabad High Court, Court

DATE: May 19, 1998, 1956, 13,600.2, 1994, 1956, 1996, 1994, 2007, 2007, 27, 1986, 1986, April 4, 1990, 1990, 77

CARDINAL: three, 93, 446, 102, 19, 92, 5, 529, 7, 62, 374, 150, 9, 30.6, 1941.7, three

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, India, S.C., Counsel

MONEY: three per cent, three per cent

LOC: Madras

FAC: Hindusthan Rope Works

WORK_OF_ART: Hindustan Radiator