Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tansukhlal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Jul-23-1971

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Order 22, Section 146 C.P.C, Order 22 Rules 3, Article 14 of the Constitution, the Law of Limitation whereas Rule 12, Article 14 of the Constitution, Constitution, Order 9 Rule, Section 48, Order 22 and Rules 3, Rule 12, Order 22, Order 22, Order 22, Rule 12, Article 171 of Schedule II, Article 171, Article 179, Expl, the Law of Limitation, Order 22 Rules 3, Section 48 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 22, Order 22 Rules 3, Order 22, Order 22, Article 14 of the Constitution.7

PERSON: C.B. Bhargava, Counsel, B.L. Purohit, Order, Bengal, Answar Ali Sirkar, Gulabdas, Narhar I.L.R. III Bom, Statutes, Rules 3, Rules 3

NORP: J.1

GPE: Tansukhlal, Jodhpur, Tansukhlal, Tansukhlal, Tansukhlal, Tansukhlal, Counsel, India, Andhra, C.P.C., C.P.C.

DATE: 31st March, 1967, 14th May, 1973, about one year, 16th July, 1971, 4, 1908, 1882, 1908, 4, 1877, 1871, 1877, 4

ORG: Vimal Kumar, State, Legislature, State, Legislature, Legislature

CARDINAL: 3, 4, 3, 8, 1952CriLJ510, 136, 13, 221, 11, 1, one, 8, 4, 12, 6, 4

WORK_OF_ART: the Law of Limitation, The Code of Civil Procedure

EVENT: Section 48 C.P.C.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //