Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mayur Laminators

Decided On : Apr-06-1994

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 80J(4)(ii, Section 80J, Section 80J(4, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 15C, Section 80J, Explanation 1, Section 80J, Section 80, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J, Section 80J(4, Explanation 1, Explanation 1, the Finance Act, Section 80J, Section 80, Section 80J(4)(ii, Section 80J

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 1,62,275, 57,066, more than ten, 10, more than 10, 4, 10 or more than 10, less than ten, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 7, 1, 2, 2.--Where, 8, 2, 4, not.9, four, 4

DATE: March 10, 1983, the assessment years 1979-80, 1980-81, 1961, 1961, 1961, the month of January, 1978, April, 1978, all the working days, a few days, eight months, 1961, 1922, 11 of 1922, 40, December 3, 1962, 1975, 1961

ORG: Tribunal, Appellate, Explanation, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Explanation, Tribunal, Clauses, Machinery, KanhiyalalRameshwar Das v., CIT, section.10, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Explanation, Tribunal, Clauses, Explanations 1, Tribunal

PERSON: D. W. tarpaulin

MONEY: 20 per cent, 20 per cent, 11.38 per cent, twenty per cent, 20 per cent

GPE: Act.3, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Explanations, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India

NORP: Indian

LOC: Act.12