Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajasthan Vs. Noor Mohd and Co. and Others.

Decided On : Apr-24-1973

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: section 274(2, section 274(2, section 145, section 274(2, section 271, section 271, section 145, section 66, section 66(1, Section 271(1, section 143 or section 144, the Finance Act, section 145(1

PERSON: B. P., Jaipur Bench, Jaipur Range, D. B. Income-tax Case, kirana, D. B. Income-tax Case, Basant Lal Om Prakash, S. K. Mal Lodha, Ramachandra Ayyar, Ramalingam Chettiar, N. M. Ranka, Wail Mohammad v. Mohammad Baksh, J. K. Cotton Spg, Abdul Kadar v. Commissioner, Heeralal Maliram, Basant Lal Om Parkash, Raghunandan Gir v., Deoraj Gir, Julien Marret v., Singh v. Achal Singh, Shadi Ram Ganga Prasad v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Lodhas, Ramachandra Ayyar, Ramalingam Chettiar, Wali Mohammad v. Mohammad Baksh, Julien Marret, Mohamed Khaleel Shirazi & Sons

CARDINAL: six, 145, 146, 147, three, six, six, one, 142, 143, 144, three, 1,000, 144/72, 3,250, 18,040, 20,000, 145, 21,289, 34,800, 1,000, 13,600, 34,800, 21,289, 146, 15,992, 6,000, 33,494, 1,000, 33,494, 25,088, 9,100, 6,000, 147, 1,33,532, 41,132, 1,000, 15,000, six, six, one, six, six, six, 1, one, six, four, one, 1, one, less than, 1, 1, six

DATE: 1961, February, 1972, 142/72, 143/72, 1972, 1972, 1972, 1972, 1972, 1967-68, 1968-69, 1969-70, each of the years, each of these years, 142/72, 143/72, these three years, 1972, the assessment year 1968-69, September 28, 1970, September 21, 1971, 1972, the year 1968-69, December 28, 1970, 7th September, 1971, April 1, 1964, 1972, the assessment year 1967-68, July 17, 1970, 7th September, 1971, this year, between 5 to 7 per cent, the earlier years, September 14, 1964, 24th February, 1972, April 1, 1964, 1964, from 1st of April, 1964, years

ORG: the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Explanation, Explanation, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sankarsons & Co., Kerala High Court, the Kerala High Court, Tribunal, the Tribunal the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Omar Salay Mohamed Sait, Tribunal, Explanation, Tribunal, Mills Co. Ltd., Sankarsons & Co., Tribunal, Vrajlal Manilal & Co., Khaleel Shirazi & Sons, Tribunal, Tribunal, Mathura Prasad v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Hanuman Motor Service, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunals, Tribunal, Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd., Tribunal, the Tribunal on the, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, procedure;.........'In, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Explanation, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Privy Council, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

GPE: Rajasthan, Jaipur, Jaipur, Jaipur, Jaipur, Abdullabhai, India

ORDINAL: 24th, second, fourth, third

MONEY: 6.25 per cent, 20 per cent, almost 400 per cent, 256(1, 256(1

NORP: Inspection

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //