Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vishal Chaudhory Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided On : May-11-2009

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 3(2, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Section 14 of the Act of, Article 22(5, Constitution, Section 14, Section 14, the National Security Act, Section 3, the National Security Act, Section 14, the National Security Act, Section 21, Section 3, Section 3, Article 22 of the Constitution of India, Article 22, the National Security Act, Section 10, the National Security Act, Section 34, the Arms Act, Article 22 of the Constitution of India.30

PERSON: ORDERK.S. Rathore, J.1, Jaipur, Anurag Singh v. State, us.11, D.B. Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No, Bajaj Nagar, Malviya Nagar, Sanganer Sadar.18, IPC, Jaipur, Jaipur, L.P. Shrivastava, Jaipur, Despatch Nos, Manish Bahal Alias Nishu, Mahant Singh, Prem Lata Sharma, District Magistrate, Yumnam Anand, M. Alias Bocha Alias Kora Alias Suraj, Anr

ORG: the District Collector, the National Security Act, the State Government, the District Collector, the State Government, the Division Bench, Court, Division, Court, RCC, the State Government, Home Department, Government of India, Principal Home, Government of Rajasthan, the Central Government, Court, the Central Government, NSA, the Central Government, the State Government, The Central Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Central Government;(b, a State Government, the Central Government, the National Security (Second Amendment) Act, Vishal Chaudhary, the District Magistrate, the State Government, the Advisory Board, Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, Court, Police Stations, Sections 354, the Superintendent of Police, the District Magistrate, the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, State, the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, State, the Central Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Office of Her Excellency, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Govt, the Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, the Board promptly- Failure, State Government, District Magistrate, the Board, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Ors, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Union of India, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the State Government, the Office of Her Excellency, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government

GPE: Jaipur, India, New Delhi, India, India, India, India, India, Jaipur, Adil, Vidhyakpuri, P.C., Jaipur City, New Delhi, India, India, India, India, Mathura, India

DATE: 1980, 1980, one years, 1980, Nov. 1995, May-June 1995, the same day, 1980, 1980, 1980, 1897, 10 of 1897, 1984, twelve months, 11.09.2008, 11.09.2008, the year 1998, 09.04.2009, 29.08.2008, 27.09.2008, August 7, August 16, August 25, August 29, 22 days, 09.04.2009

CARDINAL: 07.08.2008, 07.08.2008, 20.08.2008, 2, 584, 315.7, 14.10.94, 1, 1, 3, 2, 5, 07.08.2008, 20.08.2008, 43/2005, As many as 35, as many as 11, 107, 116(3, 110, 151, 384, 492, 427, 379, 308, 120, 365, 279, 352, 457, 325, 307, 392, 402, 399, 107, 116(3, 109, 151, 11.09.2008, 21.08.2008, 1/08, 2/08, about 6-1/2 months, 21.08.2008, about 6-1/2 months, 27.09.200825, 2001CriLJ3311, 1986CriLJ22, 1998]2SCR617, 21.08.2008, 27.09.2008, about 6-1/2 months, 21.08.2008, about 6-1/2, 07.08.2008

PRODUCT: Rajesh, Rajesh Kumar

LOC: the Superintendent of Jail

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //