Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

D.C.M. Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Decided On : Jul-02-1997

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds, Section 2(b, Section 59, the Factories Act, Section 51, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64(4, the Factories Act, Section 2(b, the Factories Act, Section 2(b, the Factories Act, the Factories Act, Section 59 of the Act of, the Factories Act, Section 2(b, the Factories Act, the Factories Act, the ESI Act, Section 2(f

PERSON: V.K. Singhal, J.1, Misc, Hoshiarpur, Mridang Cinema v., Contractor, Contractor, Principal

DATE: 1952, May 6, 1986, 1952, May 6, 1986, October 18, 1985, 1983, 1,70,06, 1948, any week, weekly, any week, any day, a week, 1948, 1952, 1952, 1948, 1948, 1952, 1952, 1997-II, 1952, 1995, 1978-II, 1989, 1952

ORG: Good Work Reward, Contractors, Good Work Reward, Good Work Reward, Contractors, Good Work Reward, the State Government, State Government, The Apex Court, Regional Provident Fund, S.D. College, Regional Provident Fund, K.T. Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd., the Apex Court, Royal Talkies, State Insurance Corporation, P.M. Patel & Sons v. Union of India 1987, AIR SC 447, Ors, RLR, un

ORDINAL: second, Firstly, secondly, first

CARDINAL: two, 156, 1,21,86,720/-, 20,41,801/-.5, 2, more than forty-eight hours, 2, more than forty-eight hours, 4, 12, 1, 1, 2, 2, two, two

PERCENT: 25%

TIME: normal working hours, over time hours, normal working hours, more than nine hours, hours, 10 hours, over time hours, more than 50 hours, normal duty hours, over time hours, the working hours, over time hours

WORK_OF_ART: Good Work Reward

GPE: Clauses, Employee

PRODUCT: 834

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //