Controller of Estate Duty Vs. N.K. Sanghi

Decided On : May-08-1973

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 64(1, the Estate Duty Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 64(1, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10 of the Act, Section 102(2)(d, the Stamp Duties Act, Section 10, Section 102(2)(d, Section 102, the Stamp Duties Act, Section 102(2)(d, the Partnership Act, Section 14, the Indian Partnership Act, the Partnership Act, Section 10, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10 of the Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 1, four, 25,000, 8, 2, 1, 4, 1, 53, us.3, 1, four, four, 8, 2, 37, 63, 65, 75, 382, 86, 73, 61, 2, 74, 73, 60, 75, 88, two, 1, 2, 8, two, 2, one, four, two, three, one, six, four, three, two, 2)(d, one, 1

ORG: the Controller of Estate Duty, Sanghi Brothers, Shri Motilal Sanghi, Shri Motilal Sanghi, the Appellate Controller of Estate Duty, the Assam High Court, Controller of Estate Duty, the Appellate Controller of Estate Duty, the Appellate Tribunal, Shri Motilal Sanghi, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sanghi Brothers, the Privy Council, the Appellate Tribunal, Controller of Estate Duty, Controller of Estate, Controller of Estate Duty, Controller of Estate Duty, Controller of Estate Duty v. Estate of Jawab S. Ibrahim Rowlher, A.P., Controller of Estate Duty, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Controller of Estate Duty, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Lordships of the Supreme Court, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, the Privy Council, The Privy Council, the Privy Council, Lordships of the Privy Council, follows:'It, Lordships, Lordships, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, Shri Motilal Sanghi, Shri Motilal Sanghi, the Supreme Court, The Allahabad High Court, Controller of Estate Duty, the Supreme Court, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, Shri Motilal Sanghi, the Privy Council, Chick, the Privy Council, Supreme Court, Controller of Estate Duty, the Supreme Court, Lordships, the Supreme Court

PERSON: Jaipur, Motilal Sanghi, Shri N. K. Sanghi, Shri N. K. Sanghi, Motilal Sanghi, Controller, Controller, Kumar Sen, S. K. Mal Lodha, Clifford John Chick v. Commissioner, George Da Costa Controller, Satyanarayan S. Mody v. Controller, Satyanarayan S. Mody v., Abdul Alim v. Controller, Kikabhai Samsuddin, Addanki Narayanappa v., Bhaskara Krishnappa, Gupta, S. Aswathanarayana Setty, N. R. Ramarathnam, Kumar Sen, C.R. Ramachandra Gounder, Suggala Veera Ragkaviah v. Controller of, C. R. Ramachandra Gounder, C. R. Ramachandra Gounder, George Da Costa v., Munro, John Chick, John Chick, John Chick, John Chick, Gupta, Munro, Munro, Munro, Munro, Addanki Narayanappa v., Bhaskara Krishnappa, Abdul Alim v. Controller, George Da Costa v., Gupta, Munro, Munro, Ramachandra Counter, Gupta, Lordships

DATE: 1953, 1953, 1st of September, 1955, 21st of July, 1961, 1964, that very day, 1959, 1967, 1967, 1970, 1972, 1969, S.C. 1300, 1934, 1969, 1969, 1966, 1970, 1973, the year 1909, 1909, '12, 300 per month

GPE: E.D., I.T.R., E.D., P.C., S.C., S.C., A.I.R., A.C., P.C., Chick, Chick, Munro, case.10, Chick, Chick, Chick, Chick, Chick, Chick, Clause, Chick, Chick, C.R.

WORK_OF_ART: Controller of Estate Duty, Controller of Estate Duly, Controller of Estate Duty8

NORP: H. R., H. R.

PRODUCT: Munro, Munro

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, first

QUANTITY: 33,501 acres