Vaishali A. Shelar and ors. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Decided On : Mar-28-2007

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89, the IT Act, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Rule 2BA, Section 10(10C, the IT Act, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 89, the IT Act, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, Section 3, Section 10(10C, Rule 2BA, Rule 2BA, Section 10(10C, the IT Act, Rule 2BA, Section 10(10C, the Provident Funds Act, the Payment of Gratuity Act, Section 10(10C).Sums, Section 10(10C, Section 10(10C, the IT Rules, Section 10(10C, Section 89, Section 89, Section 17, Section 57, Section 89, Section 89, Section 89, Section 10(10C, the IT Act, Section 89

CARDINAL: 1, 222, one, 5,00,000, 5, one, 2BA, 2BA, 34, 33, 1962.8, five, 5, 2BA, 31 to 33, 2BA, 5, 5, 5, 3, 5

DATE: the impugned years, 2004, twenty-five years, the age of fifty years, 1962, March, 2005, 1962, Rule 2BA, 1962, the years, 31, 32, Rule 2BA, 1962, annual, 2004, Rule 2BA, 25 years, 50 years of age, 1956, 3 of 1956, 1961, 59 of 1961, 10 years, 40 years of age, three months', year, the balance months, Rule 2BA, 25 years, 50 years of age, 10 years, 40 years of age, more than 10 years, more than 40 years of age, annual, annual, 1961, 1962, 1992, one-half months', three months', year, the months, a period of years, 4957, 1962, one financial year, more than twelve months, Section 17(3

PERSON: Shri V.H. Patil, B.R. Kamat, V.H. Patil, Shri Patric F. Britto, Shri Petric F. Britto, Shri V.H. Patil

ORG: Authorized Representatives, Departmental, Reserve Bank of India, RBI, RBI, OERS, RBI, RBI, RBI, Act, AO, OERS, AO, RBI, OERS, OERS, RBI, AO, the IT Department, VRS, Reliance, the Calcutta High Court, Sail DSP VR Employees Association, RBI, the Optional Early Retirement Scheme, Central Office, OERS, OERS, RBI, OERS, Department, Tribunal, OERS, RBI, OERS, RBI, RBI, the Human Resource Development, Organizational, RBI, M/s C.C.Chokshi &amp, Co., the Calcutta High Court, Lordships, Counsel, OERS, RBI, VRS, Bank of Baroda, CIT(A)-XXX, Counsel, the Administrative Circular, RBI, M/s C.C. Chokshi &amp, RBI, the Bank of Baroda, Departmental Representative, AO, Departmental, C.C. Chokshi &amp, OERS, RBI, Department, RBI, the Bank of Baroda, UTI Mutual Fund, the Calcutta High Court, Central, Central, the University Grants Commission Act, Indian Institute of Technology, the Institutes of Technology Act, State, the Central Government, the Central Government, Institutes, inter alia, AO, us.9, AO, RBI, OERS, OERS, RBI, OERS, OERS, OERS, OERS, Department, RBI, RBI, AO, RBI, OERS, Sail DSP Employees Association, Court, Departmental, the Leave Rules, the Pension Rules, the Calcutta High Court, the Writ Petn, RBI, RBI, Act, AO, CIT, CIT, OERS, Department

PRODUCT: Act.4, Voluntary Retirement Scheme, Calcutta, CIT(A)-III, Rule 2BA, Rule 2BA

PERCENT: 1998 v. Union of India, 1998 v. Union of India

ORDINAL: 9th, first

GPE: pp, New Delhi, Jaipur, Co., India, States

LOC: the Writ Petn

FAC: the Official Gazette, the Official Gazette

NORP: Hon'ble