Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajasthan Financial Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi.

Decided On : Aug-31-1966

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: section 66(1, section 3, the Banking Companies Act, the Banking Companies Act, Section 24, Section 25, Section 28, Section 34, section 24, section 39, section 25

NORP: Indian, YearLoans

DATE: 1922, between May 8, 1958, May 25, 1958, 1959-60, the financial year 1958-59, 1951, the year 1955, the financial year 1955-56, 571955-561,85,00043,78,06,00077,28,00010,12,46,0001957-581956, annual, May 22, 1955, between May 8, 1958, May 22, 1958, the assessment year 1959-60, the present day, 1949, the financial year 1958-59, the year, that year, May 25, 1957, annual, the relevant years, twenty years, a period of, seven years, twenty years, July 15, 1957, 90 days, about a years, annual, the year 1957-58, the year, the year 1958-59, the year 21, that year, the previous year, the year 1958-59, May 25, 1957, May 25, 1957, the current year, 1957-58, the current financial year, the year, 1965, 1965, 1965, a year

CARDINAL: 21,770, 21,770, 30,00,000, two, one, 3, 16,67,000, 66,70,000, 1965)30,00,00029,55,000, 196710,00,00013,89,125-0, 19673,35,0003,35,837-8, 196820,00,00019,90,000, 30,00,000, 29,55,000, 29,33,230, 21,770, 21,770, 21,770, one, two, 25,000, 52, more than 2 to, 2,50,000, 6, 39, 17, 42, 81, 17, 35, 46,51,700, 4, 5, 7, 16,67,000, 66,70,000, 12,20,000, 30,07,000, 70, 38, 18, 20, 10, 38, one, 10

ORG: Government, the Rajasthan Financial Corporation, the State Government, the State Financial Corporation Act, the State Government, the Reserve Bank, Assessment YearPrevious, Government, Saurashtra State Government Loan, Bombay State Government Loan, Rajasthan State Development Loan, Government, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Bank Ltd., Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, the Privy Council, Punjab Co-operative, Bank, the Supreme Court, Singh & Sons Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, the Court of Appeal, United Dominions Trust Ltd., United Dominions Trust Limited, the Bank of England, the United Dominions Trust Limited, Tribunal, Bank Limited v., Bank Limited, the Privy Council, Lordships, Lordships, Bank Limited, Lordships of the Supreme Court, Privy Council, Punjab Co-operative, Bank Limited, Lordships, Tribunal, Rupees, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Government, State Government, Government, the Reserve Bank, Government, Government, the Reserve Bank of India, the Reserve Bank of India against Government, State, State, Bhakra, Government, the Reserve Bank of India, the Reserve Bank of India, Central, State, State, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court

GPE: Jaipur, Sardar, England, England, India, and(f, Rajasthan

PRODUCT: the 'Act'

MONEY: 95.45 per cent, 4.55 per cent, 3 1/2 per cent

PERCENT: 02.4%, 3 1/2%, 3 3/4%, 4%, 1/2%, the 3 1/2%, 3 1/2%

PERSON: Delhi Bench ', Banks, M. D. Bhargava, Bhargava, Bhargava, Kirkwood, Janki Ram Bahadur Ram v. Commissioner, P. K. N. Company Limited, Bhargava, Bhargava, Chandmal Lodha, Lodha

FAC: Sardar Indra Singhs, Sardar Indra Singhs

ORDINAL: first, second, first

LOC: Chambel Valley

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //