Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Madan Lal Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Decided On : Dec-06-1968

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 64(1, the Estate Duty Act, Section 53(1, Section 44, Section 46(1, Section 44, Section 46(1

ORG: Bhandari, the Central Board of Revenue, the Central Board of Revenue, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Mukandas, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo Daudas, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, The Central Board of Revenue, Board, Board, Sukhdeo, the Central Board of Revenue, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Reliance, Sanwal Das v. Kuremal, the Central Board of Revenue, Sukhdeo, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Allahabad High Court, Kailashi, the Supreme Court, Lakkireddi Chinna, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, the State of Rajasthan, Sukhdeo, the Central Board of Revenue, Sukhdeo, Kanakarathanammal v. V.S. Loganatha Mudaliar, S.C. 271, Lordships, Sukhdeo, the Privy Council, Kuldip Narain, Madhoram, Sadhoram, Kuldip Narain, Lordships, Kuldip, Lordships, the High Court, Kuldip, Kuldip, Sadhoram, Lordships, Kuldip, Kuldip, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, Sukhdoo, the Central Board of Revenue, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, The Central Board of Revenue, Sukhdeo, Sukhdeo, the Central Board of Revenue

CARDINAL: 1, four, four, two, 1, four, 2, 5, 1, 1, 1, 2 to 5, 1, 2, 5, 2, 1, 2, 5, 3, 1, 1, 2, 5, 2 to 5, 1, 1, 2 to 5, 2, 4, 2, 5, five, 3, 20,000, 20,000, four, 5,000, 3, 26,436, 20,000, 1, 2, 26,436, 4, 5., four, two, 6, 408, 224, 19, 230, 340, 8, 799, 800, 2, 477, 481, 9, two, two, 1945, 1945, 135, 10, 3, 2, 5, 3, 12, Two, 1, 2, 13, 26, 133, 14, 417, 28, 15, 17, 18, 1890, 341, three, three, 19, 20, four, four, 26,436, 1, 22, 5,000, 20,000, 20,000, 2

DATE: 1953, February 24, 1957, 3rd May, 1957, age of 49 years, 10th of January, 1941, the age of 100 years, 13th of January, 1941, the year 1941, the year 1941, 3rd July, 1947, 30th March, 1960, 1941, 1928, 1965, 1955, 1955, 1963, S.C. 1601, 1604, 10th January, 1941, 1951, 1951, 1965, 1856, three years, 1954, 1960, 1219, 3rd July, 1947, 21

GPE: Jaipur, Devkuvarbai Mulji, A.I.R., Gulab Chand v., Mannilal, A.I.R., A.I.R., A.I.R., S.C., Krishnaswami, I.L.R., A.I.R., A.I.R., Jetharam v. Hazarimal, A.I.R., A.I.R., Sadhoram, the State of Rajasthan, Clause

NORP: Hindu, A.I.R., Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

LOC: Daudas

PERSON: Sukhdeo Gopikishen, Gopikishen, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Sukhdeo Gopinath, Nos, Sukhdeo Gopinath, Sukhdeo Daudas, Madanlal, Madanlal, Gopinath, Haridas Narayandas Bhatia, Amirdham v. Valliammai, Gunna J. Krishnan v. Rengachari, Chattanatha Karayalar, Ramachandra Iyer, Shankar, Venkata Reddi, Lakkireddi Lakshmama, Law, Nos, Madanlal, Suraj Mal v. Mohammed Bux, 1951 Raj, Patta, Madanlal, Muddun Gopal Lal v., Khikhinda Koer, Sadhoram, Rajbunsi, Govind, Mohini Devi, Sukhdeo Gopinath

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, second, first, second

PRODUCT: Sadhoram

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //