State of Rajasthan Vs. Onkardas - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Feb-05-1960

Court: Rajasthan

LAW: Section 197 Cr., Section 197, Sind 177, Section 197 Cr, Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 161, Section 5 of this Act, Section 6, Section 197, Section 197

ORG: ORDERJagat, State, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Pokaran Municipal Board, the S. D. M. Pokaran, the Pokaran Municipal Board, State, Court, State, State, the Supreme Court, the Municipal Board Pokaran, State, Court, State, AIR 1932, AIR 1952, the Allahabad High Court, AIR 1953, the Bombay High Court, State, follows:'No Court, the Central Government, State, the State Government, State, the Supreme Court, State, AIR 1958, Court, the Pokaran Municipal Board, Magistrate

PRODUCT: Narayan, S09

NORP: J.1

GPE: Pokaran, Pokaran, Jaipur, Amrik, Singh v. State of Pepsu, Matajog Dobey, Suganchand, Bombay

CARDINAL: 13-8-1958, 4, 420, Two, 470, 109.4, 2, 107, 4, 13-8

PERSON: Onkar, Lordships, H. C. Bhari, Narain Das, S. Y. Patil, M. P. State, Hafizul Rahman, Ram Dhyan Singh v. State, Vishwakant Shrikant, S. A. Venkataraman v., S. D. M. on, I. P. C.

DATE: 7-7-58, 1955, 1956, 7-7-58

ORDINAL: first, first, second

EVENT: SC 44

FAC: the T. A. Bill