Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Firm Ramnath Ramchander Vs. Firm Bhagatram and Co.
Decided On : Nov-11-1959
Court : Rajasthan
LAW: section 14, the Limitation Act, a Full Bench, Section 15, Section 14, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 15, Section 14, the Indian Limitation Act, the States Reorganization Act, Section 14, the Full Bench, Rule 59, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, Section 15, Section 14, the Indian Limitation Act, Pun LR 114, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 28, the Indian Contract Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, Section 14:'The, Section 14, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 15 Kishangarh Act, Section 28, the Indian Contract Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 14, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Explanation 3 to Section 14, the Limitation Act, Rule 48, Section 28, the Contract Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Cal 24, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 80 C. P. C., Section 6, Pensions Act.25, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 15, the Kishangarh Limitation Act
PERSON: Chhangani, Kishangarh, Kartik Sudi, Kishangarh, Parul Rani, Bench, 1959 Raj, Kishangarh State, Rajasthan, Ajmer-Merwara, Kishangarh State, Rajasthan, M. D. Bhargava, Young, Shri P. C. Bhandari, Bhargava, Bench, Bench, Benches, Benches, Jullundur, Amritsar, Khosla J., Kishangarh Act, K.R. Khosla, Musaji Lukmanji v. Durgadass, Kishangarh State, Ramdutt Ram, Kissen Dass, E. D. Sassoon, Mathurasingh, Maclean C. J., Kumar Dutt v., Purnachandra Sinha, it.22, Subbaran, Yagana Pantulu, Laliteshwar Singh v., Rameshwar Singh, Ramdeo Dass v., Manghanmal
CARDINAL: 1, 12, 11,454/15/-became, 1949.2, two, 1956.'4, 293, 59, two, 293, 3, 61, 35, 425, 57, 103, 22, 248, One 06, 14, 3, one, 35, 3, 38, 19, 34, 35, 260
ORDINAL: first, 24th, first, second, second, Secondly, first, second
DATE: 14th of August, 1951, 2000, 2000, the 17th of May, 1944, 14th of January, 1947, March, 23rd of August, 1950, 14th of August, 1951, March, 1958, 1944, 1944, 1956?'3, 1944, 1952, 1944-2, 1944, 1944, Cal 161.We, '16, '17
ORG: the Civil Judge, Bhadva Vadi, inter alia, Kishangarh, Kishangarh Court, First Class Beawar, Judicial, Court, the Kishangarh State Limitation Act, Kishangarh Court, the Dominion of India, the Union of India, the Dominion of India, the Union of India, us.6, Court, Court, Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd., Bench, Bench, Bench, the Division Benches, the Division Benches, Rule 59.9, the Court of Appeal, the Division Bench, Malhotra v. Ruby General Insurance Co. Ltd., Amritsar, Jullundur, Kishangarh, the Beawar Court, Court, Reliance, Indian Publishers Ltd., Aldridge, ILR, the Lahore High Court, AIR 1923, Court, AIR, High Courts, Calcutta, Continental Drug Co. Ltd., Chemoids and Industries Ltd, Contracts, AIR 1929, the Privy Council, Indian Litigation, Lordships, the Courts of Great Britain, ILR, Court, Court, Court, the Beawar Court, Sec, Court, ILR, S.R. Das J., AIR 1949 Cal 24.In, Chap, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, S.R. Das J., the Kishangarh Court, Calcutta, S.R. Das J., follows:'It, ILR, Cal 619
GPE: Limitation, Beawar, Kishangarh, Beawar, Beawar, Ranawat, Beawar, Beawar, AIR, Kishangarh, England, India, England, India, Khanchand, Beawar, Beawar, Beawar, Beawar, Kidriprasad, Beawar, Limitation, England, Singh, merits.19, Sarojendra
NORP: Hindu, Punjab, Lahore
LOC: the District Judge
PRODUCT: Chittaranjan Guha v., The Full Bench, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, Bench, a Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, Calcutta
FAC: the Ajmer-Merwara, Private International Law
LANGUAGE: English
WORK_OF_ART: Gonesh Narain ILR, Fernandez 13