Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vastulal Pareek Vs. Pareek Commercial Bank Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-08-1964

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: the Indian Companies Act, Section 453 of the Act or Rule 732, Article 1, Chapter, the Court Fees Act, Section 45B, Section 456 of the Act, Section 45B, Section 45, Schedule 1 Article 1 of the Court, Schedule 2 Article 11, Section 45, Schedule 2 Article 11, Article 1 of Schedule 1, Schedule 2 Article 11, Article of the Court-Fees Act, Suits Valuation Act, Article 3(iii)(3

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 2/-, 2, 15,000/-, 7,000/-, 1963.The, 2/-, Five, 740.3, 729, 745, 7,000/-, 1, 18, 1957.5, two, 1, two, 732, 1, 3, 2, One, 11, 23

PERSON: Vastulal, Vastulal, Chapter XXIX, Rajasthan, Vastu Lal v. Official, Schedule II

ORG: valorem court-fee, Pareek Commercial Bank Limited, the State of Bikaner, Company, the Pareek Commercial Bank Limited, Vastulal under Section 456, Government Advocate, State, Court, SRO, the Rajasthan Court Fees Act (Adaptation) Ordinance, us.4, Company, Company, the Pareek Commercial Bank Limited, a Banking Company, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Company, the High Court, a High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, valorem court-fee, valorem court-fee, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Legislature, the High Court, the High Court, Bench, Pareek Commercial Bank Ltd., ILR, Court, Court

DATE: 1913, the 31st July, 1952, 1952, 1949, 1949, the 25th August, 1960, the 16th July, the 24th August, 1959, the 26th November, 1959, 1952, 1950, 1950, the 17th April, 1957, the 30th May, 1961, 1961

MONEY: six per cent, 6 per cent

GPE: valorem, case.10

PRODUCT: Rule 743, Rule 743, F 2, Rule 736 of the Rules of our

FAC: the Rajasthan Gazette

ORDINAL: first, first, secondly, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //