Ghanshyamlalji Vs. Collector, Udaipur and ors.

Decided On : Feb-03-1958

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Section 92 C. P. C., the Collector of Udaipur, Section 92 C. P. C., Order 1 Rule, Section 92 C. P. C., Section 92, Section 539 C. P. C., Section 539, Section 539, Section 92, Section 92 Civil P. C., Section 92 Civil P. C., Section 41, the Evidence Act, Section 92, Section 92, Section 92, Section 92, Section 92 of the Code, Section 92, Section 92, Section 92 C. P. C., Rule 10 of Order1, Section 92, Section 92 C. P. C., Rule 10, Order 1, Order 1 Rule 10

ORG: Jagat Narayan, the Government of Rajasthan, Puja, ILR, AIR 1946 All 148 (C, Court, Probate, un, Government Advocate, the Advocate General, Advocate General, the Advocate General, ILR, Court, Advocate General, theAdvocate General, ILR 5 Mad 52, Secy, State, M. Murugesa Mudaliar, District Judge, Court

CARDINAL: 1, three, 1, 3 to 12, 1., 7, 7, one, 36, 109, two, 109, 132, one, 7, 7, 106, 36, One, 11

GPE: Gcswami, Sewa, Insolvency

PERSON: Govindalji Maharaja, Mehan Lalji, Goswami Shri Ghan-shyamlalji, Shrimad Vallabhacharya, Ramadas, Kanumantha Rao, Desai J., Islamia v. Latafat Ali, Madras, Dbaram Karta, Dharam Karta, Suraj Gir v., Bramh Nannn, Madras, Madras, BJ Desai J. observed:'Bower defines, Res, Malik C. J, Desai J., Admiralty, Malik C. J, mutwalli, as mutwalli, Suresh Singh v., Legal Remembrancer, Kidar Nath v., Kishan Das, Abdul Reh-, Bapu Saheb

FAC: Goswami Govindlalji Maharaj

ORDINAL: First, first, third, third, first, third

DATE: 1950, 1902, 1905, 1903, that'we, 1950, 1937, 1929

NORP: no$, Vydianadayyan

LOC: the District Judge

PRODUCT: 229

WORK_OF_ART: Bom168 (F, Collector