ito Vs. Jagdish Chandra Virmani

Decided On : Nov-10-2006

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: Section 148, the Income Tax Act, Section 148, Section 37, Section 148/143(3, Section 69C, Section 37, Section 69C, Section 69C." 5, Section 69C., Section 69C, the Finance Act

CARDINAL: 1, 32,52,000, 20,65,878, 157, 369, zero, zero, 4, 3.3, one, 20-1-2006, 5, 1-4-1999, 7, five

GPE: Dehradun, Tribunal, Delhi, Dehradun, Dehradun, Counsel

DATE: 15-1-2004, years 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96, 1996-97, 1998-99, the years, the intervening year, year 1997-98, year 1997-98, 20-5-2000, The year, the five years, the relevant years, years, five years, 1990, 1999, the assessment year 1997-98, years 1999-2000, 2000-01, years 1999-2000, 2000-01, year 1998-99, 1998, the assessment year 1999-2000

PRODUCT: order.2, Shri Neeraj

PERSON: Shrishti Complex, Rajkumar, Devpura, Hotel Joshi, Dehradun, Delhi C Bench, Delhi Bench

ORDINAL: 17,41,148

ORG: DVO, Difference Treating, CPWD, State PWD, Commissioner (Appeals, DVO, CPWD, PWD, Allahabad High Court, CIT, Income Tax, PWD, DVO, PWD, Reliance, Rajasthan High Court, CIT, CTR, PWD, Reliance, Appeals)-I, PWD, PWD, CPWD, DVO, PWD, UP PWD, DVO, DVO, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Departmental Representative, Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Shri Neeraj Kumar, Tribunal, Shri Neeraj, CIT, Shri Neeraj Kumar, CIT v. Western Estates

MONEY: 31 per cent, 31 per cent, 31 per cent, 31 per cent, 6 per cent, 10 per cent, 15 per cent, 28 per cent, 28 per cent

NORP: Western Estates