Automobile Transport (Rajputana) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Nathuram Mirdha and ors.

Decided On : Oct-14-1958

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, the Motor Vehicles Act, Setion 57, Section 64, the States Reorganization Act, Article 163(1, Constitution, Section 48(a, Section 47, Section 64, Section 64, Article 19(1)(g, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 46 of the Act, Section 57, Section 64, Section 57(3, Section 57, Section 57(3, Section 57(4, Section 64(1, Section 64(a, Article 19(1)(g).The, Section 48, Section 48(a, Section 48(a, Section 48(a, Section 47(1, Section 48(a, Section 57, Section 57, Section 48(a, Section 57.In, Section 57, Section 57, Section 48(a, Section 64, Article 163(1, Article 166 of 'the Constitution, Constitution, Section 64

ORG: Jagat Narayan, the Automobile Transport Ltd., the Ajmer State Transport Authority, the Ajmer Government, the Automobile Transport (Rajputana) Ltd., Lohia Transport Co., the Ajmer State Transport Authority, Kedar Nath Heda, Baba Transport Co., Brij Raj, the Ajmer State Transport Authority, the State of Ajmer, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the Appellate Authority, Transport, the Ajmer State Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the State Transport Authority, Reliance, Court, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Supreme Court, SC, State, State, State, the Regional Transport Authority, the RegionalTransport Authority, Authority, The Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, The Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, Legislature, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, Legislature, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, Legislature, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, itself.8, the Regional Transport Authorityis, the Appellate Authority, the Ajmer State Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authoriiy, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, Court, Court, the Regional Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, Court, the Appellate Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, Reliance, Court, AIR 1955, theConstitution, AIR 1955 Raj, the Raj Pramukh, the Raj Pramukh, the Council of Ministers, Pioneer Motors

CARDINAL: 1, 5, 2 to 6, 1, 6, 2, 3, 14, 17, three, two, 1, one, 3, 2, 12, 18, 1, 16-8-56, three, 99, three, 5, 2, 6.Only, 2 to 6, 15, 24, at least 5, 5, 2 to 6, 22-8, 6-11-57, 24, 25, 14, 17, 100, 3, 1, one, 6, 100, 19o6, 25, 3, 102, more than three, more than three, three, 5, One, 5, 6-11-1957, 24, 6-11-57

FAC: the Ajmer-Beawar

PERSON: Nos, Petitioners Nos, Naraindas Lohia, Gulab Devi, Nos, Nos, Ajmer, Nos, Rule T. A. Jodhpur, Saghir Ahmad v. State of U. P., Tho State, Bajranglal, Bajranglal, Bajranglal, Purshotam Singh v. Narain Singh, Purshotam Singh's, the Raj Pramukh, Order M. A. Majeed

QUANTITY: 25-2-56

NORP: Rules

DATE: weekly, 1956, 1958, 1958, 1958, 1958, given.11, Mad 48

ORDINAL: first, second

GPE: Bajranglal, the United State, Jagirs

PRODUCT: Raj LW 370, Raj LW 370, Raj LW 370, Raj LW 370, Ministers

LOC: Jagirdars, the Raj Pramukh