Bhuramal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Decided On : Nov-20-1956

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution, the Sales Tax Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 16, Constitution, Section 2(t, Section 4, Section 2, Section 4, the Customs Act, Lubricants Taxation Act, Section 4, Section 2(7, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 2(o, Sale of Goods Act, Constitution, Section 4, the Indian Sale of Goods Act, Section 2(7).If, Section 2(o, Section 2(o, Section 3 of the Act..... Section 3(4, Section 4, the Sales Tax Act, Constitution, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Constitution, Section 2(o, Section 2(o, Section 5 of the Act, Section 2(s, Section 2(e, section 2(f, section 2(h, Section 2(t, Section 2(t, Section 2(o, Section 2(t, Section 2(t, Section 2(t, Section 2(f, Section 2(f, Section 5, Section 2(o).In, the Sales Tax Act, Section 16, Section 2(t, Rule 7 of the Rules, Section 2(t

ORG: Wanchoo, the Public Works Department, State, labour, & after, State, the Sales Tax Officers, the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, State, High Courts, Gannan Dunkerley and Co., Madras) Ltd., State, the Sale of Goods Act, the Constituent Assembly, the Sale of Goods Act, the Privy Council, State, the Imperial Parliament, the Dominion Parliament, Central Provinces, Berar Sales of Motor Spirit, Bengal Immunity Co., Ltd., State of Bihar (S) AIR 1955, Bhagwati J.:'The, Legislature, List II.11, the Provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, the Rajasthan Legislature, the Sale of Goods Act, the Sale of Goods Act, the Legislature On the, Sale, M. R. Hornibrook, The Federal Commissioner of Taxation, the Sales Tax Assessment Act, the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, the Nagpur High Court, AC 578, Judicial Committee, Act, Lordships, Lordships, the British North America Act, Judges of the Nagpur High Court, Legislature, Sales Tax Officer v Budh Prakash Jai Prakash AIR 1954, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Judges of the Nagpur High Court, Legislature, Sections 3, Government, State, State, Individual cases.28, the Sales Tax Officer, State

PRODUCT: C.J. 1, 661, Import, 104

CARDINAL: seven, one, 2(e, 2(f, 2(h, 2(o, 2(t, 3, 5, 54, 2, 1, 3, 2(f, 2(k, 4, 3, two, 54, one, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 54, 19:'when, 1, D).9, 54, 701, 1, 2, 3, 4, 54, two, two, 54, one, 54, 62, 272, 278, 14, 54, 54, 54, 2, 614:'It, 17, 18, 716:'Over, 1867'.19, 54, 2(o, 5.23, 7, 54, 7, 54.'Consequently, 54, 103, 121, 654/8/-

DATE: 1955, 1930, 1954 Mad 1130, 1933 PC 16, 54, 54, 54, 54, 54, 1936, the years, 1930, 1906, today, centuries, 54, 54, 54, the assessment year, the 1st of April, 1955, 1st April, 1955, the 1st of April, 1955, the 1st of April, 1955, 10, 53, 54

GPE: Sections, India, Madh-ya, Canada, Canada, England, England, Australia, Yorkshire County Council, Canada

NORP: Rules, Rules, English, Rules, Rules, Rules

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second, third

LOC: Madras

PERSON: Sylvester Dunphy, Latham C. J., Rajasthan, Statute, Banarsidas, James v. Commonwealth of Australia, Wright, Edwards, Rex, Lordships, Roman Law, Madras, Rajasthan, Nos, Udaipur, Bikaner

QUANTITY: 12 miles, 24 miles

EVENT: List II, List II, AC 124, List II