State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Ratanlal Sogani

Decided On : Aug-08-1969

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Order No., Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Article 311 of the Constitution of India, the Indian Penal Code, the Limitation Act, section 27, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 102 of the Limitation Act, Section 28, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, Section 10, Section 17, Section 24, Section 28, Section 8, Section 4 of the Act, Section 8, Section 16, Article 311 of the Constitution, Section 5, Article 311 of the Constitution and, Article before, the Bengal Act No, Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Article 311, Article 311, Article 102 of the Indian Limitation Act, the Article 120 of the Limitation Act, Article of the Limitation Act, Article 102, Article 102, Article 120, Article 102, Article 120, the Fundamental Rule 52, Article 102 of the Indian Limitation Act, Rule 52, Section 240, Constitution Act, Article 102 Schedule 1, Limitation Act, Section 240, Constitution Act, Article 311 of the Constitution, Order 2, Rule 2, Section 240, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 102 of the Limitation Act, Order 2, Order 2, Rule 2, Rule 44

PERSON: C.B. Bhargava, Ratanlal Sogani, Ajmer, Baksh Singh v. Secy, Mahal, P. N. Sarkar v. State of, Madras, A. V. Anantharaman, Madras, Madras, Ex, Madhav Laxman, Vaikunthe v. State of Mysore, Zafrulla Khan, V. D. Angal v. State, P. V. Jagannath Rao, Madras, Ram Nath Chitory, Madras, V. G. C. Mandawar, Madhav Laxman, Vaikunthe

NORP: J.1

ORG: the State of Rajasthan, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, Court of Wards, Government of Aimer, State of Aimer, State of Aimer, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Union of India, State of Aimer, Incharge Court, Government of Aimer, the State of Aimer, the State of Rajasthan, the Court of Wards, the Anti Corruption Department, the Court of Wards, Arts, the Ajmer Government Court, State of Aimer, the State of Rajasthan, Court, Court, Additional Government Advocate, the Court of Wards, State, State, Sections 4, the Ajmer Government Court of Wards Regulation, the Court of Wards, State, State, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, the State Government, the Court of Wards, the State Government, the State Government, State, State, State, Regulation, the Courts of Wards, Ajmer Land and Revenue Regulation, the Court of Wards, the Ajmer Rural Boards Regulation, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, the State Government, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, Court of Wards, the State Government, the Court of Wards, the State Government, Regulation, the Court of Wards, the State Government, State, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, State, Regulation, Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, State, the Court of Wards, State, State, State, AIR 1940, Lordships, United Provinces Court, the Court of Wards Act, Lordships, the Board of Revenue, the Court o Wards, the United Provinces, the Land Revenue Acts, the Court of Wards, Regulation, Court of Wards, State, the Patna High Court, the Government Advocate, the Court of Wards, Government, the State Government, the Board of Revenue, the State Government, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the State Government, Legislature, the State of Bihar, the Board of Revenue, the Ajmer Regulation, Court, Additional Government Advocate, Court, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, Pisangan, the Court of Wards, Additional Government Advocate, AIR 1947 FC 23, Vages', Arts, Additional Government Advocate, Reliance, State, AIR 1963 Mad 425, a Civil Court, Fundamental Rules, a Civil Court, Defied, Division Bench, Court, AIR 1963, Court, Court, Court, Fundamental Rule, the Federal Court, AIR 1947 FC, the Supreme Court, SC, High Courts, the Federal Court, the Supreme Court, Federal Court, the High Court, the Lahore High Court, Court, the Federal Court, Court, Supreme Court, the State of Bombay, the Supreme Court, the Madras High Court, AIR 1947 FC 23, Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, AIR 1968 Bom 304, the Bombay High Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Union of India, AIR, the Government of India Act, Court, Union of India, Court, Court, Fundamental Rule 52, Court, Additional Government Advocate, State of, AIR 1954, SC, Court, the Supreme Court, Fundamental Rules, Government, State, Lordships, Government, the Fundamental Rules, Government, Additional Government Advocate, AIR 1962 SC 8, Court, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 6th October, 1959, 1544, 11323A, 24th September, 1949, 8th April, 1950, 467, May 1950, 1544, 11th May, 1950, 467, 16th May, 1950, 16th June, 1950, 14,, 22, 1544, 7-11-1955, three months' time, 14th July, 1960, one month's, 1888, the year 1888, 1877, 1886, 1886, '10, 1879, 1879, 1879, 1879, 16th May 1950, 11th May, 1950, September, 1949 i.e., September, 1949 to 15th June, more than three years, 1903, three years, 131.'It, the end of each month, three years, 1962, month, month, three years, August 11, 1948, 1935, Para 2042, three years, 1908.'It, the day, '15, three years, two months, 38 months, the period of, 38 months, 11323/-, 14th July, 1960, 14th July, 1960

CARDINAL: 11, two, 2000/-, 471, one, 471, 23, as many as 14, 11, three, 1, one, 101, 105, 2, 3, 82, 4, three, 1, one, two, 10, 102, 120, 115, 120, 52, 6, 4, 21, 52, 23, two, 2, 20-3-1938, 2, one, 19-3-1038, 2, 19-3, two, 12,866, two, 52, 1968, 500, one, 1, 2, 3, 44

GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, the State of Rajasthan, Pisangan, Bhagwan, Bihar, Pisangan, Bali, inoperative.12, Punjab Province, Tara Chand, Raiasthan v. B. P. Walawalkar, the Punjab Province

ORDINAL: first, first, first, 24th, second, firstly, secondly, second, third

PERCENT: 6%, 6%

PRODUCT: Regulation, Lordships Rule, Rule 2.'Their Lordships, 493

QUANTITY: 50/- p. m. from, 50/- p. m. for

EVENT: the Railway Establishment Code