Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Shyam Pulp and Board Mills
Decided On : Sep-22-2006
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
LAW: Section 143(3, the IT Act, Section 68, the IT Act, Section 143(3, Section 142(1, Section 68, ITR 1, Section 68 of the Act.4, Section 68, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 251, Section 68
CARDINAL: 1, 46A, 1962.2, 19, 19, 50, three, 3 and 4, 42,30,000, 46A, three, 53, 4.2, 3, 46A, 46A., 42.30
ORDINAL: 31st, 6th, first, first
DATE: Jan., 2003, 1998-99, 1961, 1961, previous year, Aug., 2000, 12th Oct., 2000, Dec, 2000, 1963, subsequent year, 1962, the very next year, the next year, the year
ORG: AO, AO, AO, the Calcutta High Court, CIT v. Precision Finance, P) Ltd., AO, Supreme Court, A. Govindarajulu Mudaliar, CIT, CIT, SC, Sreelekha Banerjee &, Ors, CIT, AO, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, AAC, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, CBDT, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO
PERSON: Kashipur, Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif v., Authorised Representative, Kanpur Coal Syndicate, Authorised Representative, Shri R.K. Sharma
WORK_OF_ART: Kashipur a/c
GPE: assessee, assessee, assessee, case.10
NORP: r., r.