Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Shyam Pulp and Board Mills

Decided On : Sep-22-2006

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: Section 143(3, the IT Act, Section 68, the IT Act, Section 143(3, Section 142(1, Section 68, ITR 1, Section 68 of the Act.4, Section 68, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68, Section 68 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 251, Section 68

CARDINAL: 1, 46A, 1962.2, 19, 19, 50, three, 3 and 4, 42,30,000, 46A, three, 53, 4.2, 3, 46A, 46A., 42.30

ORDINAL: 31st, 6th, first, first

DATE: Jan., 2003, 1998-99, 1961, 1961, previous year, Aug., 2000, 12th Oct., 2000, Dec, 2000, 1963, subsequent year, 1962, the very next year, the next year, the year

ORG: AO, AO, AO, the Calcutta High Court, CIT v. Precision Finance, P) Ltd., AO, Supreme Court, A. Govindarajulu Mudaliar, CIT, CIT, SC, Sreelekha Banerjee &amp, Ors, CIT, AO, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, AAC, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, CBDT, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO

PERSON: Kashipur, Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif v., Authorised Representative, Kanpur Coal Syndicate, Authorised Representative, Shri R.K. Sharma

WORK_OF_ART: Kashipur a/c

GPE: assessee, assessee, assessee, case.10

NORP: r., r.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //