Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Rajeev Tandon

Decided On : Sep-08-2006

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: Section 68, the Tax Consultant and Business Advisor, Section 68A." -, Section 68, Section 68, the Income Tax Act, Section 68, Income Tax Act

CARDINAL: 1, 407/03, 20.5.2004, 34,66,242/-, two, 34,66,242/-, two, two, 47.5, 22.2.2001, 264, 254, 237, 72, 57, 532(All, 87, 184, 22.2.2001, 184, 121, 243, 214, 82, 254(Gau, 187, 291, 269, 429, 135, 71, 240, 71, two, 59, 4, 214, 264, 22, 135, 69, 25, 2000, 243, only 7 to 8, 185, 270, 368, 47.5, 27,400/-, 22, 22,259/-, 10,000/-, 13,000/-, 21, 22, approximately less than, 011-05364-05, 8, 18, 23,036/-, 10,000/-, 10,000/-, 12, 22, 10,000/-, 23,036/-, 47.5

ORG: AO, AO, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, AO, AO, the Chartered Accountant, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, AO, Shri P.B., HSBC, HSBC, Department, Gauhati High Court, Apex Court, ITR 570, Mumbai Tribunal, ITD 156, Apex Court, ITD 200, ITD 324, Shri Surendra Khoka, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, AO, AO, AO, the Delhi High Court, CIT, ITR, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, AO, AO, AO, ITO, ITR, the Apex Court, CIT, ITR, CIT, Chartered Accountant, uncertified bank, AO, AO, AO, CIT, CIT, R.S. Sibal 269, AO, CIT, us.8, CIT, R.S. Sibal, CTR, Income Tax, TTJ, Chd, ITD 324, Tribunal, Income Tax, AO, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Income Tax, the Apex Court, Sumati Dayal v., CIT, ITR, the Settlement Commission, Sajjan Dass &amp, Sons v. CIT, ITR, AO, Tribunal, Lordships of Punjab &, Haryana High Court, CIT, CTR, Hon'ble High Court, ACIT, AO, Tribunal, C. C, CIT, CTR, Lordships, AO, Tribunal, R.S. Sibal (Supra, Sajjan Dass &amp, Sons (Supra, Lordships, Lordships, Durga Prasad More (Supra, P&H High Court, Lal Chand Kalra, the IT Tribunal, Sky Jet Aviation, the Apex Court, Lal Chand Kalra (Supra, the Rajasthan High Court, Chain Sukh Rathi, Lordships, Lordships, R.S. Sibal (Supra, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, AO, ITAT Chandigarh Bench, Tribunal, Tribunal, Guwahati High Court, Lordships, AO, AO, AO, AO, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, AO, AO, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, Usha Bhardwaj, AO, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, CIT, AO, NRI, the Apex Court, AO, AO, CIT, AO

PERSON: Shri Rajeev Tandon, P.B. Bhardwaj Rs, Shri Surender, Khoka Rs, Shri Surender Khoka, Surender Khoka, Shri Surender, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, Shri Bhardwaj, Shri Surender, Sunita Vachani, AR, Nemi Chand Kothari v. CIT, AR, AR, Taxman 492, Jawahar Lal Oswal, Chandigarh Bench, Anr, Tolaram Daga v., Sunita Vachani, Lal Chand Kalra, Sanjeev Batra v., Sukh Rathi, Anr, Sumati Dayal, Lordships, Jawahar Lal Oswal, Sunita Vachani, Hon'ble Delhi High Court, AR, Alok Bhardwaj, Usha Bhardwaj, Bhusan Bhardwaj, Alok Bhardwaj, P.B. Bhardwaj, Shri Surinder, Shri Surinder Khoka

DATE: the year, 12.2.2001, every six months i.e., 22.1.2001, 1(AT).Thereafter, 2004, 2004, 2004, 2001, 1999, 1966, 1981, 56, 1961, monthly, monthly, 3004300/-, 1961

MONEY: 65,000, 10,000, 23,036 $, 10,000 $, 10,000 $, 10,000 $, 65,000, 27,400, 22,259, 10,000, only $ 13000, 23,036, 10,000, 12 1/2 per cent

PRODUCT: Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj, Shri P.B. Bhardwaj

GPE: London, India, DR, Sumiti, DR, A.O., India, India, India, DR, Delhi, assessee, assessee, Delhi, assessee, assessee, London, US, London, assessee

ORDINAL: firstly, First

WORK_OF_ART: Though Under Section 68

QUANTITY: II v. Durga Prasad More

FAC: the Delhi Bench, Nemi Chand Kothari (Supra

EVENT: I.T. Act

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian