Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

ShrinaraIn and ors. Vs. Lachhiram and ors.

Decided On : Feb-10-1969

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Order 34, Rule 11, Order 34, Rule 10, Order 34

PERSON: C.M. Lodha, J.1, Jaipur, Benami, Benami, Hari Narain, Benami, Benami, Benami, Gangadara Ayyar v., Kanakarathanammal, V. S. Loganatha, Gopal, Benami, Misrilal v. Surji, Shyamsundar, Darbhangi Rai, Pat 420, Girdharilal, Krishan Datt, Benami, Benami, Kishenlal, Azim Bux (D.W. 5, Ex, Ex, Azim Bux and Gangaram, Civil P. C. Order, Civil P. C., D. W. 1, Ghamandi Ram v. Shankarlal, Gulam Shafi, Ravji v. Gopalji, Ameenuddin v. Harsingh Das, Khader Ali, Gian Singh, Mohan Lal, Ram Kishan v. State, Nos, Civil P. C.

CARDINAL: three, 348, 2, 1, 31-12-63, 1, 2, 500/-had, 3, 451/-.All, three, 1, 2, 500/-, 500/-, 3, 500/-, 87, 86, 2, 500/-, 500/-as, 265/-, 2, transferee, 204, 214, three, 500/-, 8., 405, 575.9, 1, 11, 500/-, 13, 214, 4, 3, 3, 4, 15/-, 4, 3, 328, 346, 204, 214, 332, 500/-

DATE: 1964, 20-4-1956, 20-7-1964, 1950, six months, 1950, 1969, 1969, 1969, 1950 PC 28, 1960, 1960, 22-8-1958, D.W. 3, 11, six months, Rule 11, '12, 1969, monthly, 1950, 1965, Raj 19, 1963 Bom 42, 1963, 1964, 1970, 104.15, 1969, 1969, six months

ORG: the Court of Munsiff-Magistrate, Lachhiram, Hari Narain, Lachhiram, Munsiff, Munsiff, the Court of District Judge, Lachhiram, Court, Lachhiram, Hari Narain, Lachhiram, Lachhiram, Lachhiram, Court, Lachhiram, Court, Harinarain's, Hari Narain, AIR 1949 FC 88, AIR 1965, SC 271, Narayan, AIR 1960 SC 100, AIR 1966, SC, AIR, Harinarain's, Lachhiram, Lachhiram, Hari Narain, Lachhiram, Lachhiram, Lachhiram, Harinarain (D. W. 2, Gangaram, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court under Clause, Court, Court, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, the Raiasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction, Bench, AIR 1967 Madh Pra 237, Kamalakar & Co., AIR 1963 Hyd 129, Bench, Court, Division Bench

GPE: Jaipur City, Shrinarain, Mohinuddin, the City of Jaipur, Jaipur City, Shrinarain, Mohinuddin, Jaipur City, Jaipur, Mohinuddin, Jaipur City, Shrinarain, Mohinuddin, Jaipur City, Shrinarain, Mohinuddin, Mohinuddin, Jaipur, mortgagee, Shrinarain, Mohinuddin, appeal.6, Satish Chand, Satish Chand, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Mohinuddin, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Subramania, Singh v. Bhagirathi, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Gokulchand, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Shrinarain, Clause, Shrinarain, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Shrinarain, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Shrinarain, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Ramcharanlal, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Mohinudin, Shrinarain

FAC: Moti Cungari Road, the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction, Additional District Judge No, the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction, Additional District Judge No, Harinarain as Benami, Harinarain as Benami, rulings:-- Purshottam v.

LOC: the Additional District, Harinarain, Additional District, Harinarain, Harinarain, Harinarain, Harinarain, Harinarain, Additional District, Harinarain, Harinarain, Additional District, Additional District

PERCENT: 12%, 12%, 12%, 12%, 6%, 12%, 6%

QUANTITY: 10-2-1969.He

WORK_OF_ART: Civil Second Appeal No. 332

NORP: Bharat, D., D.

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Rupees 500/-, Raj LW 333

MONEY: six per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //