State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. the Bundi Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Bundi and anr.

Decided On : Aug-14-1969

Court : Rajasthan

LAW: Article X of the Covenant, Article VI of the Covenant, Article VI of the Covenant, Article IV of the Covenant, Article IV of the Covenant, Article II, Article shall, Article IV of the Covenant, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 74 or, Article 110, Article 19 of the Limitation Act, Article 131 of the Limitation Act, Article 120 of the Limitation Act, Article 110 of the, Article 115, Article, Article 120, Article 115, Article, Article 116, Article 116, Section 73, Section 73, Article 116, Cal 277.12, Article 116, Article 115 and Article 116, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Article 116, Article 110, Article 115, Article 120, Article 115, Article 115 or, Article 116, Article 115 of the Limitation Act.13, Section 19, the Limitation Act, Article 115

ORG: Bhandari, the Bundi Electric Supply Co. Ltd., the State of Rajasthan, the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bundi, Bundi State, State, Phoolsagar, State, State, State, Phool Sagar, the Bundi Electric Licence, State, Power House to Phoolsagar, the Bundi Electric Licence, Power House, Bundi, The Government of Bundi, the Bundi State, the State of Rajasthan, State of Bundi under Article 295 of the Constitution of India, the Government of Rajasthan, Government of the State of Bundi, State, Phoolsagar, the Maharaja of Bundi, Court, Court, the State of Rajasthan, the Bundi Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Bundi, Bundi State, State, the Bundi State, the State of Bundi, the Bundi State, Court, State of Bundi, Kushalgarh, Bundi, Dungarpur, Kotah, the Raj Pramukh, the Administration of the United State of, Rulers, State, the United State of, Rulers, the Raj Pramukh, the Government of the, the United State of Rajasthan, the Raj Pramukh, the Raj Pramukh, Clauses, Clauses, State, State, the Raj Pramukh, Ruler, the Government of the Covenanting State, State, the Raj Pramukh, Clauses, State, State, Union, State, the Rajasthan Administration Ordinance No, the Raj Pramukh, Covenanting State, State, Legislature, State, the Ruler or Government, State, the Raj Pramukh, the Government of Rajasthan, the Matsya Union, the State of Ajmer, Government of State of Bundi, Clauses, the State of Bundi, Covenanting State, State, State of Bundi, State, the Supreme Court, State, AIR 1964 SC 1495, State, State, Dalmia Dadri Cement Company's, AIR 1958, SC, State, State, State, State, Lordships of the Supreme Court, State, State, Government of the State of Bundi, the State of Rajasthan, the Bundi State, State, the Ruler of the Bundi State, Bundi State, the Bundi State, the Bundi State, the Bundi State, State, Bundi, the Government of Bundi State, the State Government, the Government of Rajasthan, Finance Department, the Accountant General, the Bundi Electric Supply Company, Bundi, vou, the Bundi Electric Supply Company, the State Government, State of Bundi, the Phoolsagar Palace, Bundi, Court, the Allahabad High Court, Town Area Committee Raya v. Budh Sen, AIR 1962, the Allahabad High Court, the Allahabad High Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, ILR, the Allahabad High Court, Ganappa Putta, AIR, Lalchand Nanchand Gujar, Co. v. Union of India, AIR 1923 Cal 507:--'In, Dixon, Calcraft, Knight, the Oxford Dictionary, the Judicial Committee, the applicability of Articles 110, the Allahabad High Court, AIR 1962 All, the Supreme Court, Durga Prasad Chamaria, AIR 1961, the State Government, Bundi

CARDINAL: two, 1957.2, 1, 1, 6,000/-, 6,000/-will, 6,000, 48,000/-, 11,880/-, 1, 6,000/-, 24,000/-, 31, 33, Two, 1, 1, 24, 6,000/-, 24,000/-, 48,000/-, 24,000/-.5, three, 25-3-48, 18-4-48, 28-4-48, 1, one, 3, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 30-3-49, 274, 1, 7, 3, 1, 28-4-48, 2, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 15,975/-, 1, 15,625/-given, 215/9/-, 12, 31, five, 6,000/-, 26, eight, 4, 1908.10, 6,000/-, 1, 6,000/-, 1, 6,000/-, 1, 2, 6,000, 1, 1, 1, 438, 1, 3, 600, 1925, 440, 37, 1, 2, one, 116, 116, 438, 2, 6000/-, 1-4-1954, 2, 6000/-, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 6,000/-, 24,000/-

EVENT: 4th September

ORDINAL: 9th, first, first, second, second, first, second, 26th, first, first, second

DATE: October, 1945, a period of fifteen years, a period of, three months, 250/-per month, 1936, the period of, 15 years, 15 years, 1936, 1948, 26th March, 1948, 1959, 1948, later than 1st day, May 1948;And, the first day of, May 1948, 1949, 1949, the year 1949, 6,000/- every year, pre-April, 1950, March, 1948, 1st April of every year, the year 1949, every year, one year, 1881, 1881, 1913, 1963, 1892, 1891, 29-11-1958

QUANTITY: about five miles

GPE: Ex, the Bundi City, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, Rajputana, the Rajasthan Union, Banswara, Jhalawar, The United State, the Rajasthan Union, Rajasthan Union, States, United State, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, States, States, States, the United State, Rajasthan, the United State, Rajasthan, the United State, the United State, States, the United State, Rajasthan, the United State, Rajasthan, the United State, Rajasthan, Rajasthan v. Shyamlal, States, New State, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, Ex, follows;'I, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, Skinners, Shapoor, Ex

PERSON: Royal, Ex, Rajputana States, Shahpura Partapgarh, Covenant, Covenanting State, Rajasthan, that-- Ed, Covenant, Covenant, Covenant, Covenant, A. W. Robertson, Dewan, Rajasthan, Articles 110, Theka, Art 115, Khan, Hafiz Ali Khan, Spankie, J., Nobocomar Mookhopadhaya, Siru Mullick, J., Spankie, J., Hammad Saiba, Narayan Hari, ILR, M. L. Dalmiya, Asutosh Mukerjee, J., Mohamed Mozaharal Ahmad v., Mohamed Azimaddin Bhuinya, Esher, Fry, Trikamdas y. Gopi Nath, Fredoom Mazda

FAC: the Ruler of Mewar, Phoolsagar Palace

WORK_OF_ART: Ordinance, the Civil Law

PRODUCT: 816, 6 Cal 94, the Full Bench of, Co.

NORP: Roman Jurists

LOC: Articles 115