Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Laukik Developers Vs. Dcit

Decided On : Jul-10-2006

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 80-IB(10, the I.T. Act, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 80, Section 80, Section 5(1)(iv, the Wealth Tax Act, Section 80IB(10, Section 80, 01.04.05 i.e., Section 80, Section 10(23G, Section 80IB, Section 80, Section 54-G, Section 139 of the Act, Section 80IB(10)(c, ITR 577, Section 80, Section 80HHBA(4, Section 80IB(10, Section 80, Section 80 IB, Section 11, General Clause Act, General Clause Act, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 80, Section 80, the I.T. Act, Section 80IB(10, Section 80 IB(10)(c, Section 80-IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80-IB(10, Section 80-IB(10, Section 80-IB(10, Section 80HHBA(4, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80-IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80-IB(10, Section 5(1)(iv, the Wealth Tax Act, Section 5(1)(iv, Wealth Tax Act, the Wealth Tax Act, Section 80.IB(10, Section 80IB(10, the I.T. Act, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10)(c, Section 80IB(10)(c, Section 11, the General Clause Act, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10)(c, Section 80IB(10)(c, Section 80IB(10, Section 80IB(10

CARDINAL: 1, 10, 10, two, 25, six, more than 1,000, 4, three, 197, 212, 2,00.0, 80, 10, 25, 622, more than 25, 200, 103, 271, 227, 196, 105, 179, 88, 192, two, 80, 10, 10, 25, 25, 622, 622A, 25, 10, 10, two, 25, six, more than 1000, one thousand and five, 01 04.05, 80IB(10, 80, 25, six, more than 1,000, 25, six, 1000, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25.3, more than 25, six, more than 1,000, less than 1500, 25

DATE: year 2002-2003, 1961, the assessment year 2005-2006, year 2002-2003, the earlier years, the assessment year 1992-93 and, 1993-94, any previous year, 1961, the 31^st day of March, 2005, the 1^st day of October, 1998, 2004, the year, the relevant year

GPE: Gajbandhan, Dombivali, Gajbandhan, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Thane, Mumbai, Mumbai City, Mumbai, Mumbai, Dombivali, Gajbandhan, Mumbai, Delhi, Mumbai, Gajbandhan, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, assessee, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Ld, Ld

WORK_OF_ART: Developing and Construction of houses, Housing Project, "Housing Project", "Housing Project", Housing Project, Housing Project, Housing Project, Housing Project, Housing Project

ORG: Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation, KDMC, Corporation, ITR 258, Assessing, Housing, Maharastra Chamber of Housing Industry, Maharastra Chamber of Housing Industry, CBDT, IB, the Municipal Corporation of BMC, Pune Tribunal, Mangalam Inorganics Pvt Ltd., CIT, Hon'ble Gwahati High Court, Gwahati, ITR 123 (SC, SC, SC, ITR, SC, Tribunal, CBDT, Maharastra Chamber of Housing Industry, IB, BMC, the Pune Tribunal, ITA No, Tribunal, Tribunal, Housing, Department, Housing, Dombivali, KDMC, CBDT, Maharastra Chamber of Housing Industry, CBDT, the Building Project of the assessee, KDMC, Income Tax Act, Department, BMC, BMC, the Pune Tribunal, Mangalam Inorganics Pvt Ltd., Sangamner, Corporation of Greater Mumbai, BMC, BMC, Mulund, BMC, Km

QUANTITY: 3143 Sq. feet, 3143 square feet, 1500 sq. feet, 3143 Sq. feet, one acre, one thousand square feet, twenty five kilometers, 3143 Sq. feet

PERCENT: 5%, 100%

PERSON: Sangamner, No.(2, Kalyan Dombivali Municipal, Kms, Naka

ORDINAL: first, first, first

MONEY: hundred per cent

NORP: Hon'ble

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //