Morbi Nagar Palika (Nagar Sevasadan) Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Decided On : Jul-02-2007

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Section 33-C(2, the Industrial Disputes Act, the ID Act, Section 33-C(2, the ID Act, Section 33-C-2 of the ID Act, Section 33-C(2, the ID Act, Section 33-C(2, the ID Act, Section 33-C(2, the ID Act, Section 33-C(2, the ID Act, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Limitation Act, the Payment of Wages Act, Section 33-C(2, the I.D. Act, Section 33-C(2, the I.D. Act, Section 33-C(2, the Payment of Wages Act, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2).It, the Constitution Bench, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Section 10(1, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 10(1, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(1, Section 33-C(2, Chapter VA, Section 33-C(2, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33-A, Section 33-C, Section 10(1, Section 33-C, Section 33, Section 10(1, Section 10(1, Section 33-C. Similarly, Section 33-C, Section 33, Section 10(1, Section 33-C.16, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, the I.D. Act, Minimum Wages Act, Article 227 of the Constitution of India.11, Section 33-C(2, the I.D. Act, Section 33-C(2, the I.D. Act, Section 33-C(2, the I.D. Act, Article 227 of the Constitution of India.12., Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227, Constitution, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution the High Court, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Constitution

PERSON: H.K. Rathod, K.R. Dave, Sunit Shah, Sandhya Natani, Vinay Pandya, Amit Patel, Hukum Singh, Morbi Nagarpalika, K.R. Dave, Patil Raghav, Natha, Karnataka, Dave, K.R. Dave, K.M. Shah, H.L. Gokhale, Dave, Dave, Dave, Keshavlal Maneklal Shah, Muhshaw, Counsel, Calla, Natwarlal Amrutlal Shah, Srinivas Rao, Bench, Srinivas Rao's, Bench, M.S. Shah, D.H. Waghela, District Panchayat, Anr, Dave, Dave, Anr, Mohansingh Pardeshi, Ouseph Mathai, M. Abdul Khadir, Waryam Singh v. Amarnath, Laxmibai R. Tarta, Sita Ratna Rao., Ashalata S. Gurnam, Trimbak Gangadhar Teland, Roshan Deen v., Preeti Lal, Dave

NORP: J.1, Nagarpalika, Hon'ble, R., U.P.

GPE: Asstt, Telecom, P.S., Telecom, Lallubhai, District Panchayat, Us, Laxmikant, Unnao

ORG: Respondent State Authority, Labour Court, the Labour Court, Labour, Learned Advocate, Labour Court, Labour Court, Labour, Labour Court, Labour Court, State, Ors, S.M. Nilajkar and, 31.3.2003, Pune Municipal Corporation, Botad Nagar, Labour Court, Labour Court, the Apex Court, Bombay Gas, FLR 304, SC, Central Bank of India, FLR 141, SC, Court, GSRTC, Court, Court, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Labour Court, the Labour Court, Labour Court, Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Labour Court, Labour Court, Learned Advocate, Court, Court, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, Court, ESI Scheme, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Honourable Supreme Court, Bombay Gas Co., FLR 304, SC, the Supreme Court, Bombay Gas Co.'s, FLR 304, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Payment of Wages Act, the Payment of Wages Act, Central Bank of India, AIR 1964, FLR 141, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Labour Appellate Tribunal's, the Labour Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd., AIR 1974 SC 1604 :, FLR 56, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Bombay Gas Co., Central Bank of India, The Labour Court, Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees Association v. Union of India 1997, FLR 25, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Telecom Department, FLR 143 (, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, FLR 266 (, SC, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Bombay Telephone Canteen Employees', the Hon'ble Supreme Court, ESI Scheme, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the ESI Scheme, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court, KSI Scheme, the Labour Court, Bapubhai Parmar v. Panchmahals, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the District Panchayat, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, The Central Bank of India Ltd., P.S. Rajagpalan, AIR 1964, FLR 141, SC, the Apex Court, Union, Legislature, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Maxwell, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, Botad Nagar Palika, the Labour Court, Baroda in Recovery Application, the Labour Court, Court, Court, Court, Labour Court, Labour Court, Service Rules, the Labour Court, Labour Court, Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Labour Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, The High Court, the High Court, Ors, Apex Court, the High Court, Article, the High Court, Court, Hills Division, Bhahutmal Raichand Oswal, AIR 1975 SC, Court, the High Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Chandavarkar, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, The High Court, Court, the High Court, State, AIR 1984 SC 1401, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court

DATE: 1947, 1947, 1947, thirty days, 10 years, 1947, ten years, 1966, 1239-1244, 1245 of 2001, 2003, 2006, 2006, 1947, three months, 1947, 1963, 1963, 1988, 1947, 1947, 1947, each year, each year, year 1982-83/1992-93, any year, each year, 1982-83/1992-93, 1983, 1983, 1982 to 1993, ten years period two, 1998, 4, 1996, 17 years, the year 1990, 1973, 1986, 1977-89, the year 1990, 1963, 1963, Para 13, 1963, 1953, 1954, 1962, 1974, Para 12, 1998, 1978, 2005, 1907, 17.10.1988, 17.10.1988, 17.10.1988, 1990-91, 1990-91, 31.12.1999, 17.10.1988, at least five years', 240 days', each year, 1947, 17.10.1.988, 17.10.1988, the year 1973, five years', 240 days', each year between 1973 and, 1990, 17.10.1988, 1947, 1963, 1950, 1956, 2006, 1989, weekly, ten years, 1947, 1947, 1947, each year, 1982-83, 1947, each year, 1995, Para 9, 2002, 1958, 1240, 1297, 1977, 2002, 1984

WORK_OF_ART: 23.2.2007, Nagarpalika under Section 33-C(2, Bangalore Wafer Supply and Sewerage Board, Bangalore Water Supply, Bangalore Water Supply, Clause of Sub-section, Paragraph 12:12

CARDINAL: 6000.00, six thousand, 600.00, 723, 21.4.1969.(2, 97, 28.7.2006.5, 1, two, 7, 7, 2, 996, two, two, two, 330, 452, two, 600.00, 600.00, 600.00, 6000.00, 600.00, 2, 5, 2, 161, one, 7, 7, 743, 7, 752, 21.10.1955, 29, two, 3, 78, 36, nearly two, 3, 29.9.2003, 17.10.1988.The, 1.4.2000, 1.4.2000, 743, 7, 16:15, two, two, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2).10, 200, 500/-, two, two, two, 6, 576, 1, 319, 5:4, 226, 227, 1954, 565, 1, 122, 128, 460, 226, 227, 2, 437, 110, one, two, one, 1, 100, 226, 227, 2, 673

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, District, Single

PRODUCT: Para 8

FAC: the District Panchayat, the District Panchayat, the District Panchayat, the District Panchayat, the District Panchayat, the District Panchayat, Nagendra Nath Bose v. Commr

ORDINAL: first, second, first

EVENT: Para 15