Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sheelaben M. Patel Vs. Ito

Decided On : Nov-22-2005

Court : Gujarat

LAW: the Income Tax Act, section 131 of the Act, section 131, section 10(3, section 10(3, section 131, section 131 of the Act, section 10(3

PERSON: D.A. Mehta, J. P. Shah, B.B. Naik, Surat, 5,00,101, Surat, 5,00,101, 5,00,101

ORG: Tribunal, Shri Navinbhai Ratilal Modi, ADI, ADI, ADI, B.C. Srinivasa, High Courts, Act.6, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 4,00,000, 4, 31-3-1990, 80, 1,00,101, 4,00,000, 500,101, 400,000, 400,000, 400,000, 1981]128ITR294(SC, 500,101, 10-1-1995, two, 1,00,101, 4,00,000, 4,00,000, 4,00,000, 4, 1,00,101, 4, 1,00,101, 4, two, 4,00,000, 1,00,101, 4,00,000, 4,00,000, 1,00,101, 4,00,000, 4,00,000, 4,00,000

DATE: year 1990-91, 1961, monthly, this year, the month of January, 1990, 28-10-1991, the year, '5, 1,00,101, findings.11

GPE: Dhiraj Sons, sources'.8, assessee, Tribunal.12

ORDINAL: first, second, second, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //