Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Adolf Patric Pinto

Decided On : Feb-23-2006

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 158BC, Section 132, Section 158BE, Section 132, Section 132, Section 158BE, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132, Chapter-XIV-B., Section 132, Section 132, Section 132, Section 158BE, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(1, Section 2, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(8A, Section 132(8A, Section 132(3, Section 158BE, Section 132(3, the Explanation to Section 158BE(1, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(8A, Section 132(1, Section 132(3, the Bangalore Bench, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(5, Section 158BE

CARDINAL: 1, 7, 1, 236, 1961.2, 2, 5, 5, 18-6-1998, 29-6-1998, 1-8-1998, 1961.6, 18-6-1998, 175, 176, 181-182, 23, 19-6-1998, 24, 187, 189, Two, 24, 25, two, two, 25, 194 to 197, 198 to 200, 29-6-1998, 25-6-1998, two, 23, 200, 29-6-1998, 922B, 23, 19-6-1998, 1-8-1998, 19-6-1998, 128, 2000, 113, 76, 948, 93, 1035.13, 1-8-1998, 19-6-1998, 298, 302, 19-6-1998, 200C, 1-8-1998, 29-6-1998, 23, 19-6-1998, 19-6-1998, 132, 1, 1, 87, 7.3, 7.3, 132(8A, 19-6-1998, two, 19-6-1998, 1-8-1998, 19-6-1998, 1-8-1998, CIT[1998, 67, 45, 5,729, 1,69,000, nearly 500, 19-6-1998, 2, 5, 20

ORG: Id. CIT, the Id. CIT, first cross, the Apex Court, National Thermal Power Co. Ltd., CIT, Office No, Stock Exchange Building, House, 2nd Floor, Steel, Office No, House, Second Floor, House, 2nd Floor, CIT, Neena Wadhwa v. Dy, CIT, CIT, CIT, Madhuvana House Building Co-operative, Society, Asstt, TTJ, Co., Asstt CIT, TTJ, House, Second Floor, Hon'ble High Court, House, Second Floor, PO, PO, Joint, Board, Joint, Joint, PO, PO, CIT, ITD 439, PO, the Search Party, Hon'ble Bombay High Court, Pune, Kirloskar Investments and Finance Ltd., Asstt, Counsel for the Department, Panchnama, Appellate Tribunal, Reliance, the Allahabad High Court, Sriram Jaiswal v. Union of India, Cross Objections, Cross Objection, Cross Objection, Revenue

GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Dalai Street, Mumbai, Dalai Street, Mumbai, Dalai Street, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bang, Visakhapatnam, Kumar, Mumbai, Mumbai, PO, Clause, PO, PO, assessee

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, 9th, second, 9th, 9th, 9th, 9th, first, second, second, first, second, second, 1st

DATE: 28-8-2000, two years, the end of the month, 922B, 922B, the same day i.e., 922B, 922B, 1-8-1998, 1-8-1998, that day, 2003, 2005, the end of the month, 1-8-1998, 1-8-1998, 2000, 21 of 2000, 2003, sixty days, 1-8-1998, October 16, 1996, between October 16, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 7, 1996, between October 16, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 26, 1996, October 26, 1996, October 20, 1996, July 1, 1995, 1-8-1998, 28-8-2000

FAC: Dalai Street, Page Nos

PERSON: Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, N. Naik v. Dy, T.S. Chandrashekar v. Asstt, Trib, Shri Ash, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, Sandhya P.Naik, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, 158BE, C. Ramaiah Reddy v. Asstt, Sandhya P. Naik, Sandhya P. Naik, Abrol

EVENT: the Section 132(1

TIME: the late hours, odd hours, the same odd hour

QUANTITY: 45 kgs, 45 kgs, 6 kgs

PRODUCT: Section 153BC

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //