Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Adolf Patric Pinto
Decided On : Feb-23-2006
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
LAW: Section 158BC, Section 132, Section 158BE, Section 132, Section 132, Section 158BE, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132, Chapter-XIV-B., Section 132, Section 132, Section 132, Section 158BE, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(1, Section 2, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(8A, Section 132(8A, Section 132(3, Section 158BE, Section 132(3, the Explanation to Section 158BE(1, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(8A, Section 132(1, Section 132(3, the Bangalore Bench, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(3, Section 132(5, Section 158BE
CARDINAL: 1, 7, 1, 236, 1961.2, 2, 5, 5, 18-6-1998, 29-6-1998, 1-8-1998, 1961.6, 18-6-1998, 175, 176, 181-182, 23, 19-6-1998, 24, 187, 189, Two, 24, 25, two, two, 25, 194 to 197, 198 to 200, 29-6-1998, 25-6-1998, two, 23, 200, 29-6-1998, 922B, 23, 19-6-1998, 1-8-1998, 19-6-1998, 128, 2000, 113, 76, 948, 93, 1035.13, 1-8-1998, 19-6-1998, 298, 302, 19-6-1998, 200C, 1-8-1998, 29-6-1998, 23, 19-6-1998, 19-6-1998, 132, 1, 1, 87, 7.3, 7.3, 132(8A, 19-6-1998, two, 19-6-1998, 1-8-1998, 19-6-1998, 1-8-1998, CIT[1998, 67, 45, 5,729, 1,69,000, nearly 500, 19-6-1998, 2, 5, 20
ORG: Id. CIT, the Id. CIT, first cross, the Apex Court, National Thermal Power Co. Ltd., CIT, Office No, Stock Exchange Building, House, 2nd Floor, Steel, Office No, House, Second Floor, House, 2nd Floor, CIT, Neena Wadhwa v. Dy, CIT, CIT, CIT, Madhuvana House Building Co-operative, Society, Asstt, TTJ, Co., Asstt CIT, TTJ, House, Second Floor, Hon'ble High Court, House, Second Floor, PO, PO, Joint, Board, Joint, Joint, PO, PO, CIT, ITD 439, PO, the Search Party, Hon'ble Bombay High Court, Pune, Kirloskar Investments and Finance Ltd., Asstt, Counsel for the Department, Panchnama, Appellate Tribunal, Reliance, the Allahabad High Court, Sriram Jaiswal v. Union of India, Cross Objections, Cross Objection, Cross Objection, Revenue
GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Dalai Street, Mumbai, Dalai Street, Mumbai, Dalai Street, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bang, Visakhapatnam, Kumar, Mumbai, Mumbai, PO, Clause, PO, PO, assessee
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, 9th, second, 9th, 9th, 9th, 9th, first, second, second, first, second, second, 1st
DATE: 28-8-2000, two years, the end of the month, 922B, 922B, the same day i.e., 922B, 922B, 1-8-1998, 1-8-1998, that day, 2003, 2005, the end of the month, 1-8-1998, 1-8-1998, 2000, 21 of 2000, 2003, sixty days, 1-8-1998, October 16, 1996, between October 16, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 7, 1996, between October 16, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 20, 1996, October 26, 1996, October 26, 1996, October 20, 1996, July 1, 1995, 1-8-1998, 28-8-2000
FAC: Dalai Street, Page Nos
PERSON: Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, N. Naik v. Dy, T.S. Chandrashekar v. Asstt, Trib, Shri Ash, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, Sandhya P.Naik, Atmaram Building, Francis Xavier Lane, 158BE, C. Ramaiah Reddy v. Asstt, Sandhya P. Naik, Sandhya P. Naik, Abrol
EVENT: the Section 132(1
TIME: the late hours, odd hours, the same odd hour
QUANTITY: 45 kgs, 45 kgs, 6 kgs
PRODUCT: Section 153BC