Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shakuntala P. Devlekar Vs. Surat Municipal Corporation

Decided On : Apr-30-2002

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Section 56(3, Section 56, Section 56(3, Section 56(3, Section 62, the Banking Regulation Act, Constitutional, Article 311 of the Constitution, Rule 46 of the Pension Rules, Article 311 of the Constitution and, Article 311 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, the Rule 68, Article 311(1, Rule 68, Article 14 of the Constitution, the Punjab Municipal Act, Constitution, Constitutional, Section 62, Section 62, Section 319, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, the Epidemic Diseases Act, Section 2, the Epidemic Diseases Act, Chapter IV of Schedule, Section 62, Section 62, Section 319, Section 62, Section 319, Section 56(3, Section 319, Section 319, Section 62, Section 62, Section 62, Section 319, Section 319, Section 319, Section 319, Chapter XIV, Section 319, Section 319, Section 63(21, Section 63(24, Chapter V. of the, Chapter IV of Schedule, Section 62, Section 319, Section 63(6, Section 62, Section 67(3, Section 56, Section 56, Section 56(3, Section 56, Section 56, Section 56(3, Section 62, Section 62, Section 56, Section 56 of the Act, Section 56, Section 56 of the Act, Section 56(4, Section 319, Rule 53, Section 56, Article 311

PERSON: R.K. Abichandani, Order, Surat, Order, Order, Cotton Mills, Order, Rule, L.K. Ratna, Jashwant Singh v. State of Punjab, Order, Tulsiram Patel, Jai Shanker v. State, Deokinandan Prasad, Order, Order, Order, Order, C.L. Subramaniam v., Nepal Singh v. State, Order, Regulations, Kumar Mishra v., Caltex, Order, S.C. Kaushik, Articles 14, Order, Olga Tellis v., Tulsiram Patel, Surat, Surat, Surat, Order, Surat, Surat, Order, Order, Reid, Baldwin, A.C. 40, Cotton Mills, Tulsiram Patel, Olga Tellis v., Order

ORG: Letters Patent Appeals, Surat Municipal Corporation, the Standing Committee, the Surat Municipal Employees, the Municipal Commissioner, the State Government, the Municipal Corporation, Court, the Standing Committee, Orders, the Special civil Application No., Court, Union, Corporation, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, Court, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, Supreme, Swadeshi, Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 818, Court, the Supreme Court, Institute of Chartered Accountants, AIR 1987, SC, the institute of the Chartered Accountant of India, Council, the Disciplinary Committee, the Supreme Court, K.I. Shephard v. Union of India, AIR 1988, SC, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1991, the Supreme Court, Union of India, AIR 1985 SC, the Supreme Court, K.C. Joshi v. Union of India, AIR 1985 SC 1046, Trade Union, the Supreme Court, AIR 1966, the Supreme Court, Government, the Supreme Court, AIR 1971, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1972, inquiry.[j, Supreme, U.P., AIR 1984, Sub Inspector of Police, Court, the Supreme Court, U.P. Warehousing Corporation, Vijay Narayan Vajpayee, AIR 1980 SC 840, the Warehousing Corporation, the Supreme Court, Court, Corporation, the Supreme Court, U.P. State Handloom Corporation Ltd., Supp, U.P. State Handloom Corporation, the Supreme Court, Corporation, Corporation, Supreme Court, the Corporation's Service Rules, Order, the Supreme Court, J.M.A. Industries Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1989, Government, Caltex Oil Refining (, CORIL, the Undertaking of Caltex (India) Ltd., the Supreme Court, AIR 1981, Municipal Committee, Committee, Court, Union of India, Kashmir High Court, Constitutional, Corporation, the Municipal Corporation, the Standing committee, Court, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, Orders, Municipal, the Standing Committee's, the State Government, Bombay Municipal Corporation, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Reserve Bank of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Syndicate Bank, Syndicate Bank Staff Association, AIR 2000, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Liberty Oil Mills v. Union of India, the Surat Municipal Corporation, the State Government, State, the State Government, the Municipal Corporation, the Municipal Corporation, the Municipal Corporation, Corporation, the Surat Municipal Corporation, the Surat Municipal Majdoor, The State Government, Government, Municipal, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, Sections 316, Municipal, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Sections 315, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Corporation, The Municipal Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the State Government, the Municipal Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Municipal, Corporation, the Municipal Corporation, Corporation, the Municipal Commissioner, the Standing Committee, Court, Corporation, the Standing Committee of the Corporation, The Standing Committee, Standing committee, Court, the Standing Committee, Corporation, the Standing Committee, Standing Committee, Court, The Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Municipal Corporation, the Standing Committee, Corporation, the Corporation of issuing, the Supreme Court, Swadeshi, Union of India, Corporation, the Supreme Court, Liberty Oil Mills v. Union of India, Corporation, Corporation, Municipal, Court, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Standing committee, Supreme, Union of India, Bombay Municipal Corporation, Supreme, Court, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee

DATE: August 1989, 1997, September 1994, 1st October 1994, 12677, 1994, 1994, 7th April 1997, August 1998, 1949, 1-10-1994, 1416, five years, five years, five years, 1987, more than five years, 1998, 1985, 1985, (1996, 2198, 1984, 22nd September 1994, 23rd September 1994, 1897, 25th September 1994, 1897, 23rd September 1994, 24-9-1994, 24-9-1994, 24-9-1994, 25-9-1994, 25th September 1994, September 1994, 25th September 1994, 24-9-1994, 90 days, 1949, 31st October 1994, 27th September 1994, 25-9-1994, misconceived.14, 25-4-1994, around 29th September 1994, 11th July 1996, two weeks, 8th August 1996, 12th August 1996, 1580 of 1996, 1st October 1994, 1964, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1985

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Kashmir, Single, Jammu, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single

CARDINAL: pneumonic, 30-9-1994, 11, about four, 25, four, four, Three, 3, 1-10-1994, 686, 25, 22, 2, 174, 16, 4, 114, 1-10-1994, 30-9-1994, 3, 3, 9, 16, 3, pneumonic, 30-11-1994, 25, 8, 25, 25, 1, 317, 318, 53, three, 319, 53, 53, 53, 53, 3, 1, 2, 3, 17.1, 3, 3, about 29, 4, 3, 3, 3, one, 79, 1, 3, 53, 1-10-1994, 1-10-1994, four, 3, 3, four

WORK_OF_ART: Orders, The Collector of Customs, SC, The Collector of Surat, Orders of the Administrator

ORDINAL: fourth, first, second, first, second, 26th, third, first, second

NORP: Rules, Surat, Surat, Rules, Rules, Rules

GPE: India, Rajasthan, Ravindra, D.K., XIII, H.L.Trehan v. Union of India, S.L. Kapoor v., Jagmohan, Mohd, Jammu, beings.15, cases.19, Ridge

PRODUCT: Chartered Accountant

EVENT: SC 385, SC 492, SC 84, SC 568, SC 136

FAC: Regulation 16, Constitutional, Jayantilal Ratanchand Shah v.

QUANTITY: 25-9-1994

TIME: the hour

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //