Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dineshchandra S. Shah

Decided On : Jul-09-2008

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Section 17 of the Act, the Finance Act, Section 268A of the Act

PERSON: K.A. Puj, Kiranbhai H. Shelat, Anr, Kaumudini Narayan Dalai, Anr, Shri M.R. Bhatt, J.L. Bhatia, Ahmedabad, Manish Bhatt, Bhatt, P. Arangaswamy, M.D. Patil, E.A. Rqjendran, Sri Anil Singh, S.N. Divatia, Anr, wherein, Hiralal Bhagwati v., Divatia, Involved

ORG: CIT, the Supreme Court, Court, CIT, CTR, Tribunal, the Division Bench, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Court, Court, Union of India, Ors, Court, Court, ITO, the High Court Cell, the Chief CIT, CIT-VII, SLP, MCA, MCA, SLP, Court, Court, High Courts, B.M. Parmar, Development Officer, LIC v. CIT, CIT, CIT, CIT v., CIT, CIT, the apex Court, Court, MCA, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Ors, Kaumudini Narayan Dalal, the Supreme Court, Asstt, CIT, CTR, SC, ITR, the Revenue the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, Supreme, Board, Board, MCA/SLP, Board, MCA, Board

DATE: 27th April., 1998, 27th April, 1998, 54, 1993, 19, 1997, 1998, 27th April, 1998, 13th May, 2008, 27th April, 1998, 2008, 1st April, 1999, year, 1995, 2008, 2008, the three years

CARDINAL: 132, 272, 121, 132, 15, 147, 43, 132, seven, 2001]249ITR219(SC, one, 15(2, six, 2, 2000]242ITR563(Mad, 3, 4, 1999]235ITR514(Mad, 5, 1995]214ITR368(AP, 6, 215, six, 216, 23, 300, 214, 2000]246ITR188(Guj, 1, 268A(1

GPE: permissible?3, Ahmedabad, Surat City, assessee

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //