Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dineshchandra S. Shah
Decided On : Jul-09-2008
Court : Gujarat
LAW: Section 17 of the Act, the Finance Act, Section 268A of the Act
PERSON: K.A. Puj, Kiranbhai H. Shelat, Anr, Kaumudini Narayan Dalai, Anr, Shri M.R. Bhatt, J.L. Bhatia, Ahmedabad, Manish Bhatt, Bhatt, P. Arangaswamy, M.D. Patil, E.A. Rqjendran, Sri Anil Singh, S.N. Divatia, Anr, wherein, Hiralal Bhagwati v., Divatia, Involved
ORG: CIT, the Supreme Court, Court, CIT, CTR, Tribunal, the Division Bench, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Court, Court, Union of India, Ors, Court, Court, ITO, the High Court Cell, the Chief CIT, CIT-VII, SLP, MCA, MCA, SLP, Court, Court, High Courts, B.M. Parmar, Development Officer, LIC v. CIT, CIT, CIT, CIT v., CIT, CIT, the apex Court, Court, MCA, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Ors, Kaumudini Narayan Dalal, the Supreme Court, Asstt, CIT, CTR, SC, ITR, the Revenue the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, Supreme, Board, Board, MCA/SLP, Board, MCA, Board
DATE: 27th April., 1998, 27th April, 1998, 54, 1993, 19, 1997, 1998, 27th April, 1998, 13th May, 2008, 27th April, 1998, 2008, 1st April, 1999, year, 1995, 2008, 2008, the three years
CARDINAL: 132, 272, 121, 132, 15, 147, 43, 132, seven, 2001]249ITR219(SC, one, 15(2, six, 2, 2000]242ITR563(Mad, 3, 4, 1999]235ITR514(Mad, 5, 1995]214ITR368(AP, 6, 215, six, 216, 23, 300, 214, 2000]246ITR188(Guj, 1, 268A(1
GPE: permissible?3, Ahmedabad, Surat City, assessee