Kameshwari Finance and Leasing (P) Vs. Dy. Cit

Decided On : Jan-13-2006

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: the SEBI Act, the IT Rules, Chapter IV-E of the Act, Section 18, Section 19, the Sale of Goods Act, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 20, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, section 199, section 203

DATE: 18-12-2000, year 1997-98.2, 1992, 5 years, three years, 3 or 5 years, a period of, 3 years, 18-1- 1996, 18-1- 1996, 4-10-1997, 10-10-1994, 1-11-1996, July-August, 1996, 16-8-1996, the year ended 31-3-1996, 29-10-1996, 1977, 45, 9-1/2 months, 18-1- 1996, 6-10-1997, 21 months, 1-11-1996, only 11 months, July-August, 1996, 16-8-1996, the year ended 31-3-1996, 29-10-1996, 10 months, 1982, 1-11-1996, 1-11-1996, 1-11-1996, 1-11-1996, 18-1- 1996, 1-11-1996, 1962, 18-1- 1996, 18-1- 1996, 18-1- 1996, 18-1- 1996, 1930, 18-1- 1996, 21 months, 1-11-1996, 6-10-1997, about 11 months, 88, 18-1- 1996, 18-1- 1996, 1980, 2003, 1985, 1978, 1956, 18-1- 1996, 1-11-1996, 1962

GPE: New Delhi, assessee, New Delhi

ORG: Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, Board called, Securities &amp, Exchange Board of India, Board, DIP, M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF, SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., Securities &amp, Finance Co., SRF Ltd., M/s Thakur Vadhyanath Aiyar &amp, Co., SRF Ltd., SRF, Mumbai Stock Exchange, M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., TDS, TDS, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, SC, TDS, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, M/s SRF Ltd., The Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., Securities &amp, Finance Co., SRF Ltd., M/s Thakur Vadhyanath Aiyar &amp, Co., SRF Ltd., SRF, Mumbai Stock Exchange, The Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, CIT, Bharat Nidhi Ltd., The Commissioner (Appeals, DCM, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, TDS, the Commissioner (Appeals, TDS, TDS, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, Bharat Nidhi, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Departmental Representative, TDS, the Commissioner (Appeals, M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, Learned Departmental Representative, M/s SRF Ltd., ANZ Grindlays Bank, Connaught Place, the Sale of Goods Act, the Sale of Goods Act, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, CIT, Bharat Nidhi Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, M/s SRF Ltd., M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, M/s, Shrirarn Consolidated Ltd., M/s, Shrirarn Consolidated Ltd., M/s SRF Ltd., M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., Hon'ble Bombay High Court, CIT v. Tata Services Ltd., ITR 594, M/s DCM, Shriram Consolidated Ltd., Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, the Bombay High Court, Tata Services, Departmental Representative, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Union of India &, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, McDowell &amp, Co. Ltd., CTO, SC, CIT, Rajendra Prasad Moody, SC, TDS, TDS, TDS, TDS, TDS, TDS, Central Government, TDS

CARDINAL: One, less than 25, 100, 100, one-third, one-third, 1, one, 10, 78, 6-10-1994, 8.80, 79.20, 23,49,170, 6-10-1994, up to 5, 8.80, 8.80, 79.20, 88, 8.80, 79.20, 10-10-1995.It, 5, 6-10-1997, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8.80, 1-11-1996, 50, 50, 2, 50, 268, 47.20, 30-9-1996.(c, 32.50, 50, fifty, three, five thousand, 110, 8, 4.62, 88, two, 6-10-1997, 50, 50, 50, 268, 47.20, 30-9-1996.(c, 32.50, 50, fifty, three, five thousand, 6, 133, 1-11-1996, 5, 6-10-1997, 88, 50, 5, Three, 4.6, 9.03, 88, 88, 8.80, 8.80, 88, 6-10-1997, 5, 7,57,300, 30-3-1996, 18, 20-24, 21-30, transferee, 18, 1996.The, 6-10-1997, 18, 1996.Next, 50, 1-11-1996, 3,78,65,000, only 7,57,300, 50, 88, 6-10-1997, 50, 6-10-1997, 1-11-1996, 122, 18, 1-11-1996, 18, 1-11-1996, 263, 154, 115, 30A(1, One, 30A

MONEY: 20 per cent

PERSON: Seth R. Dalmia v., Justified, Seth R. Dalmia, Anr, Azadi Bachao Andolan &amp, Anr

ORDINAL: first, Thirdly, first, Secondly, first, first, first, Secondly, third

TIME: 74 of the Act, 18-1-1996

WORK_OF_ART: the Sale of Goods Act

PRODUCT: 706

NORP: r.