Semantic Analysis by spaCy
N.R. Zala Vs. Bank of India
Decided On : Jul-21-2004
Court : Gujarat
LAW: Article 46, Article 38, Article 39(b, Paras 11, Negotiable Instruments Act
PERSON: K.S. Jhaveri, Soni, Soni, Soni, Soni, side.4, Soni, Gopalakrishna Prabhu v., Soni, Soni, Meerut, Soni, A. Baliah David v. Regional, Inquiry Officer, Soni, Chudgar, Chudgar, Chudgar, Chudgar, P.C. Kakkar, Wednesbury, Soni
NORP: J.1, Rules
DATE: 29.11.2002, 10.4.2002, September 2002, that day, 25.9.2002, 25.9.2002, 27.9.2002, 27.9.2002, 11.10.2002, 21.11.2002, 11.6.02 i.e., next day, the days, 11.6.2002, next day, 0.6.04.02, the next day, 2001, I.C. 2671, 1995, 1997(4
ORG: the Disciplinary Authority of the respondent Bank, pension and/or provident fund, the Memorandum of Settlement, the Appellate Authority, INS Valsura Branch, Cashier, Disciplinary Authority, CSE, the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority, Central Bank, Kerala High Court, CSE, CSE, CSE, CSE, CSE, Rs.41500/- knowing, CSE, CSE, the Supreme Court, A.L. Kalra, The Project and Equipment Corporation of India Ltd., AIR 1984, the Apex Court, M/s Glaxo Laboratories, Labour Court, AIR 1984, SC, the Supreme Court, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders, Madras High Court, Central Bank of India, Inquiry Officer, the Supreme Court, Tarachand Vyas, & Disciplinary Authority, the Apex Court, the Preamble of the Constitution, State, Preamble, the Supreme Court, United Commercial Bank, the Supreme Court, Court, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, Inquiry Report
CARDINAL: 4.3.2003, 23.9.2002, 29.11.2002, 4.3.2003, 1991(1, 383, 2, 12.6.02, 12.6.2002, 11.06.02.'Therefore, one, 31, 19.5, 465, 12
ORDINAL: 9th, second
GPE: KLT, question.5.2
FAC: Rs.41,500/-
LOC: Ch, Ch, Ch, Ch, Ch, Ch, Ch, Ch, the Scheduled Castes
PRODUCT: Orders