The Dhanvarsha Builders and Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Decided On : Oct-21-2005

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

LAW: Section 158BC, Section 144, the IT Act, Section 132(4, Section 158BC, Section 142(1, Section 144.2.3, Section 132, Section 158BC, Section 158BC, Section 131, Section 131, Section 69, Section 132, Section 133A on 15.02.1996, Notice Under Section 158 BC, Section 133A, Section 40A(3, Section 40A(3, Section 40A(3, Section 132(4

CARDINAL: 1, 8, 12, only one, 10.04.1996.2.2, 48,95,000/-, 1.00, 10.00, 1.00, 11.04.1996, 02.09.1996, 752.75, 10,32,000/-, 562, 562, 271.59, 639, 49.25, 48.95, us.3, 125, 95, 60, 1, one, 350, 229, 121, 48.95, 20.64, 48.95, 2, 12, 48,95,0007-(Rupees, three zeros, thousands, 4.4, 63, 651, 69, 241, 4200, 579, 400, 179, 4200, 579, 258, 654, 65, two, 49, 663, 2.50, 11.51, 11.51, 2.50, 51, two, 4200, 48.95, 8, 10.32, 31.04, 1.44, 75, 1.44, 105, 110, two, 23.12.1996, 24.12.1996, 4200, 5.02.1996, 11.04.1996, two, 25.09.1996, 263, 169, 2, 12, 48.95, 48.95, 31.00, 27.02.1996, 60, three zeros, three zeros, three zeros, three, 12, 4200, one, 4200, one, 112, 40.00, 8.95, two, 400, 179, 579, 14.74, 8.95, 5.79, 14.74, 14.74, 48.95, 48.95, 14.74, 48.95, 1, 14.74, 14.74

ORG: AO, Counsel of the assessee, AO, Shri Akalank, AO, Tribunal, Promain Limited, ITD 489, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Tribunal, Counsel, Counsel of the assessee, Promain Ltd., 59 &amp, AO, Nil, AO, Shri Akalank M. Mishrikotkar, Dhanvarsh Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., Dhanvarsh Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., Counsel, Counsel, AO, Bench, Counsel, Counsel, Hon'ble ITAT Ahmedabad, Abhishek Corporation v. DCIT, TTJ, AO, ACIT, TTJ, AO, AO, Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, CIT, AO, Tribunal, AO, TTJ, ACIT, TTJ, Tribunal, Deepchand &amp, Co., ACIT, TTJ 421, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Shri Jaibhagwan Goyal, Counsel, Counsel, Rajender, AO, CIT, AO, AO, assessee.5.2, DR, AO, Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, The Hon'ble Court, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, Section 40A(3).Therefore, DR, AO, Counsel, AO, 59 &amp, Counsel of the assessee, Counsel, Shri Akalank, Dhanvarsha Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., Dhawal, DR, AO, AO, DR, Shri Akalank, Shri Akalank, Shri Akalank, un, AO

DATE: 16.02.1996, earlier years, year, 15.02.1996, 17.01.1997, 25.09.1996, 1981, 4895, 1996-97, 1996-97, 10.04.1996, 1999, 2000, 4200, 2002, 1999, 1971, 1995, 12.08.1996 and, 16.12.1996 and, 27.01.1997, 04.02.1997, 17.02.1997, two full months, 2003, September 23, 1993, the year, 15.02.1996, the assessee, ii, the assessment year, the year, 1996-97, 4200, AY 1996-97, the year, the year, year 1996-97, some other year, only day to day, a particular year, the previous year, year

PERSON: Mishrikotkar, Goyal, Mishrikotkar, Shri Akalank, Shri Akalank, Counsel, AMM, Chander Mohan Mehta v. ACIT(lnv, Sushiladevi S. Agarwal, Counsel, Shri Anup Agrawal, Shri Rajender Agrawal, Pune Bench, Shri Akalank's, Jalna Nagar Parishad, Jalna, Shri Akalank M. Mishrikotkar, Rajender, Rajender Agarwal, Counsel, lakh.6.3, Counsel

GPE: Jalna, India, Rajendra, assessee, Bombay, DR, DR, DR, Counsel

ORDINAL: first, first, first, Third, third

NORP: Hon'ble, ITAT, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Hon'ble

PRODUCT: Dinesh, 327

QUANTITY: forty eight lakh ninety five thousand

WORK_OF_ART: Ahmedabad, Bench, Bench

FAC: Green View Restaurant v.