Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bhadrabala Wd/O. Bhupendra Shelat Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Decided On : Dec-15-1995

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Food Adulteration Act, the Civil Appeal No, Rule 188, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 15, the Appeal Rules', Rule 13, Rule 13, Rule 13, Rule 15, Rule 13, Rule 13, Rule 15, Rule 13, Rule 13 of the Appeal Rules, Section 164, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 16, Rule 188

PERSON: M.R. Calla, Bhadrabala, Shah, Bhadrabala, Shah, Counsel, Shah, K.S. Rujasekhariah v. State.(2, Shah, Siemens Engg, Shah, Thakore, Shah, aforesaid.15, Pranlal Shah, Shah, Counsel, Shri G.M. Malvat, Registrar, Petitioner, Shah, Item Nos

LOC: J.1

CARDINAL: 14, 2/3rd, 4-12, 3-12-1973, 6, 23-8-1995, 12, 5, 6-12-1963, 10-5-1971, 161, 11, 24, 17-8-1972, 19-6-1973, 10-8-1973, 17, 161, 3-12-1973, 3-12-1973, 11-12-1973, 25, 16, 25, one, 21, 4-12-19956, 21, 923, 28-3-1978, 13-3-1979, 3-12-1973, 10-12-1979, 4-12-1973, 11/15, 1/3rd, 2/3rd, 4-12-1973, 14, 25, 25, 1-8-1995, 23-8-1995, 23-11-1995, 188, 189, 1 to Rule 33, 12-12-1995(1, 14, 14, 206, 1990CriLJ2148a, 1, 14, 9-4-1981, 9-4-1981, 14, 14, 9-4-1981, 14, 9-4-1981, 14, 9-4-1981, 6, 188, 27-11-1979, 27-11-1979, 27-11-1979, three, 10-12-1979, 1, 31, 11, 27-11-1979, 11/15, 9-4-1981, 14, 9-4-1981, 11/15, 7, 2, 14-12-1995However, 2, 30-10-1963, 13, 15, 13, 1, 200/-, 1, 9-4-1981, 17-10-1969, 9-4-1981, 17-10-1969, 3, one, 10, 49, one, 49, 3, 40 to 50, 10, 5.30, 17-10-1979, 6, 21, 1, 31, 19-4-1994, one, 9-4-1981, 9-4-1981, 10, 11, 27, 15-12-1995These, 505, 543, 508 to 511, 10-8-1973, 508 to 511, 3, 508, one, 9 to 11, eleven, 9-4-1981, more than one, more than one, 188.26, 14, 3

ORG: the Legal Department of the Government of Gujarat, Shri B.J. Shelat, ex-Metropolitan Magistrate, Bombay Civil Services Rules, Judicial, a Resident Magistrate, the State of Gujarat as, Magistrate, City Magistrate at Ahmedabad, a Metropolitan Magistrate at, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Letters Patent Appeal, S.L.P., the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Inquiry Officer, The High Court, Special Civil Application, The Special Leave Petition, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1978, the Supreme Court, Appeal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Government, Government, the High Court, A.G.P., A.G.P., A.G.P., under:188, Government, the Bombay Civil Services Conduct, AIR 1968, Mfg. Co. v. Union of India, S.N., the High Court, Advocate General, the High Court, K.S. Rajasekhariah v. State, the Mysore High Court, Government, Government, the Mysore High Court, the Mysore High Court, Government, the Mysore High Court, Division Bench, Government, Advocate General, the High Court of, Registrar, the High Court, the High Court, Registrar, Registered Post, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court's, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, fails.14, Registrar, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, A.G.P., Court, the Full Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, NFJF, the High Court, Plot No, Maharashtra Brahmin Co-operative, Housing Society Ltd., the Bombay Civil Services Conduct, Appeal Rules, the Bombay High Court, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, Appeal Rules, the Legal Department, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, the High Court, Appeal Rules, Government, Government, Division, Government, the High Court's, the Judges of the High Court, the Bombay High Court, consideration.18, the Chief Magistrate, High Court, the Chief Magistrate, Court, Advocate, Court, the High Court's, Court, Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Judicial, Board, the Chief Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Advocate General, the Registry of the High Court, the High Court, hud, the High Court, Advocate General, Advocate General, Registry, the High Court's, 9th Court, City Magistrate, Advocate, the High Court's, Food Adulteration Cases, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the City Civil Court, The High Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Criminal Revision Applications, Criminal Revision Application Nos, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Criminal Revision Application Nos, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Criminal Revision Application, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Advocate General, these Criminal Revision Applications, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Rule 188.25, the High Court's, Government, Government, Special Civil Application

GPE: Ahmedabad, Bombay, J.D., J.M.F.C., the City of Ahmedabad, G.P.S.C., B.C.S.R., Gujarat, B.C.S.R., ground.12, Gujarat, Counsel, Borivalli, Borivalli, Ahmedabad, Borivalli

DATE: 1959, 11-9-1995, 1-5-1960, 4-11-1961, 50 years of age, 4-12-1968, 9-11-1970, 55 years of age, the age of 55 years i.e., 24-12-1973, 1977, 1109, 27-11-1979, 9-4-1980, 8-8-1980, 14-9-1981, Rule 188, July, 1995, 1995, 2146 of 1995, 12-9-1995, February, 1982, 10-12-1979, the years 1959, 1963, 1969, 8-8-1980, 8-8-1980, the year 1959, the year 1963, the year 1963, the year 1963, 6 years, 14, three years, between 1968 and 1970, August, 1969, Rule 1X8, daily, the day, the particular day, 22, annual, the year 1971, annual, the year 1971, para 31, the year 1971, 20-4-1977, 1972, 1972, six months, 1000/-, 1972, 23 years, 23 years, a period of, three months

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, Fourth

TIME: 9-11-1970, the eleventh hour

PERCENT: 50%

NORP: Rules, Rules

PRODUCT: Rule 188, Rule 188, Rule 188, Rules, Rule 188, Rule 188

QUANTITY: 9-2-1982, 9-4-1981.19

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //