Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Gujarat Vs. Siddik Haji Ibrahim Patel

Decided On : Apr-17-1996

Court : Gujarat

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Indian Forest Act, Section 52, Section 26(1, Article 227, Section 52 of the Act, Section 61A to Section 61, Section 61-A, Section 52, Section 61-C., Section 61-A, Section 61-D(2, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227, Section 52 of the Act, Section 61A, Section 52, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2(4, Section 2(6, Section 26(1)(f, Section 41, Section 41, Section 41, Chapter by notification, Section 78 of the Act the Rules, Section 41, Section 42.7, Section 2(4, Section 2(4, Section 2(4, Section 2(4, Section 2(4, Section 42.8, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 61-A, Section 61-A, Section 61-D of the Act, Section 61-A, Section 52 of the Act, Section 55, Section 61, Section 52, Section 61A, Section 61C, Section 61D, Section 61-A, Section 61-A of the Act.10, Section 61-A, Section 61-A., Section 61-A of the Act, Section 61-A., Section 61-A, Section 52, Section 61-A of the Act, Section 61, Section 61-A, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, Section 61-D of the Act, Section 194, Section 194, Section 4(2, Indian Penal Code, Section 4(2, Section 4(2, Section 9, Section 409(2, Section 400, Section 400, Section 400 Addl, Section 69, Section 69, Article 227 of the Constitution of India

ORG: H.R. Shelat, State, Additional Sessions, Vadodara, Chhota-Udepur, Narmada Dam Project, The Government of Gujarat, Suratalav/Tarsada, Godhra, GTB 6765, the Halol Forest Check-post, the Court of Session, the State of Gujarat, the Conservator of Forest, State, Court, Court, Manubhai, Conservator of Forests, Valsad, the State of Gujarat, the State Government, the State Government, Magistrate, and(b, Laxman Dhula Naik, Kanubhai Shankerbhai Tadvi, Kanubhai Shankerbhai Tadvi, Forest Department, Narmada Project, Section 41(2)(b, Bombay Government, Bombay Forest Rules, the State of Gujarat, the State Government, the State Government, the Bombay Government Gazette, the State Government, the Bombay Government Gazette, State, Vide Clause, the Bombay Forest Rules, Government, the Court of the Sessions Judge, Gujarat State, Government, Magistrate, the State Government, Court, Government, Gujarat State, Chhota-Udepur, The Preamble, Range Forest, K', the Court of Session, A.P.P., Vadodara, the Sessions Court, Vadodara, Court, Court, A.P.P., the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Courts, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Appellate Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, A.P.P., the High Court, 'Sessions Court', Court, Asst, Legislature, Sessions Court, Vadodara, Asst, Asst, Asst, Courts, Court, Judges of, the Sessions Court, Asstt, the High Court, Asst, the 'Court of Session', The Court of Session, Asst, Court, the Court of Session, Court of Session, Court of Session, Asst, the Court of Session, Asst, Asst, the Court of Session, Court, the Court of Session, the Court of Session, Asst, Asst, the Court of Session, Asst, Asst, State, City Sessions, Asst, State, Asst, Asst, Gambhirsinhji Bhavsinhji Padhoriya v. State of, Court of Session, the Court of Session, Court, Babaldas Becharbhai Chavda, Government, the Record a Proceedings, Criminal Appeal No

NORP: J.1, Sessions, Gujarat, Rules, non-Govt, Sessions, Sessions, Sessions, Sessions, Sessions, Sessions, Sessions

CARDINAL: 30-11-1994, 27, 12, 1,000/-, 50, 28-4-1994, 6/94-95, 1,000/-, 12, 27, 1,000/-, 226, 61, 2, 836, 4, 25,000/-, 50, 27, 23, two, 66, one, two, one, one, one, two, one, 66, one, 61, 1, 27, 50, 227, one, 1985CriLJ751, 1989CriLJ1, 1993(1, 649, 399, 401, 409, 1993(1, 27

DATE: 1994, 1994, 1985, 1985, 1942, 1879, Rule 66, 30 days, 1973, 12-5-1994, the next date, 1973, 1973, 1973, 1973, 1989, 1994, 2nd September, 1996, 30-4-1996

PERSON: Kanubhai Shankerbhai, Naika Jugla Vasava, Naika Jugla Vasava, Cri, Addl, Babubhai Patel, Anr, mahua flowers, mahua seeds, kuth, xxxA, Firoz Sattar, Shantilal Ranchhodbhai Tadvi, Nayka Jugla Vasava, Siraz Yusuf Shaikh, Nayka Jugla Vasava, Nayka Jugla Vasava, Tarsada, Addl, Vadodara, Raval, Addl, Tirmizi, Addl, Raval, Tirmizi, Mohd Mustaqim, Addl, Vadodara, Manubhai Babubhai Patel, jurisdiction.14, Addl, Addl, Vadodara, Addl, Vadodara, Addl, Vadodara, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Kehar Singh, Delhi Admn, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl, Addl

GPE: Sinduri, Kanubhai Shankerbhai, Godhra, India, Sinduri, Tarsada, Tarsada, Bombay, Bombay, Clause, Tarsada, Godhra, Sinduri, Tarsada, Gujarati, Mohd, Yunus, India, Judges, Judges, Karnataka v. Muniyalla, Judges, Gujarat, Gujarat, made.19, Baroda, Baroda, Baroda, Baroda, Baroda

FAC: Pavagadh Round Cri, Kanubhai Shankerbhai Vasava, Bombay Land Revenue Code, Halol Check-post, under:61G. Bar

QUANTITY: three inches

TIME: 24 hours, 11-00 a.m.

ORDINAL: first, second, second

WORK_OF_ART: SaH

PRODUCT: Vide Section 61-D of the Act, Vide Section 61-D of the Act Sessions

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //