Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gujarat Electricity Board Vs. Narayanbhai Kalubhai Bhamre

Decided On : Mar-19-2002

Court : Gujarat

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 17B, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25Fof, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25F, Section 11A, the Electricity Act, Constitution, Section 11A, the Industrial Disputes Act, Constitution, the I.D. Act, Section 2(oo, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25F, the I.D. Act, Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Rule 12.21, Rule 16.24, Section 100, Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 12.21, Constitution, Article 16 - Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Constitution, Section 25Fof, the I.D. Act, Section 2(oo, the Industrial Disputes Act, the I.D. Act, Section 25F, the Industrial Disputes Act, Article 226, Constitution, Article 226

PERSON: H.K. Rathod, S. P. Hasurkar, A. K. Clerk, Surat, A. K. Clerk, Hasurkar, Hasurkar, Hasurkar, Hasurkar, Hasurkar, A. K. Clerk, Clerk, Exh, Exh, Exh, Exh, Exh, Fakirbhai Chaudhari, Exh, Exhs, Discipline, M. Mohammad Yaqub, Anr, Shammi Bhan, Vijai E. V. Eldred, Swarup, Exh, W. 2, Exh, W. 2, W. 2, Shukla, Exh, Standing Order, Nepal Singh v. State, Singh, Haryana, Jagdish Chander, Kumar Pathak v., Hasurkar, Anr, Anr, Ramesh S. Handkare, Hasurkar, A. K. Clerk, Hasurkar

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 795, 3, three, 113, 113, 227, 4, 113, 227, 5, 113, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, 113, 15, one, 26, 25/28, 60, two, two, one, 113, 226, 227, 226, 227, 113, 113, three, 113, 71, two, 1, 2, 2, 6, 549, two, 12, 11, 12, one, 12, 45, 8, 9, more than one, 10, 2, 11, 6 to 8, four, four, 7, 12.21, 2, 567, 964, 8, 12, 16, 3, 259, 13, 113, 227, 14, three, 113, two, 15, 227, 471, 227, 8), 16, 17

ORG: the Labour Court, Court, Court, Learned Advocate, Court, Advocate, Advocate, Service Regulation, the Gujarat Electricity Board, the Labour Court, Advocate, Service Regulation 113, Court, Service Regulation, Learned Advocate, Court, Court, Learned Advocate, the labour Court, Court, Court, Watchman, Security Department, Service Regulation, the Labour Court, Gratuity, Exhs, xerox, the Labour Court, Exhs, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, Court, the Labour Court, Court, Court, Watchman, Security Department, the Labour Court, Service Regulation, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, Service Regulation, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, Court, The Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, the Labour Court, Court, Court, Service Regulation, the Gujarat Electricity Board Conduct, this Service Regulation, -Board under Service Regulation, the Gujarat Electricity Board, the Apex Court, Scooters India Ltd., The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Uptron India Ltd., SC, The Apex Court, Court, Scooters India's, Standing Order, the Security Inspector, the Security Inspector, the Senior Time Keeper, the Apex Court, AIR 1985 SC 84, The Apex Court, the Government Servant's Conduct Rules, the Government Servants' Conduct Rules, Government, Court, The Apex Court, AIR 1991 SC 1490, the Apex Court, D.K. Yadav, J.M.A. Industries Ltd., The Apex Court, AIR SCW, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Rule 12.21, Court, the First Appellate Court, Court, Court, State, AIR 1995 SC 984, Court, Punjab Police Rules, the High Court, Court, Court, the Allahabad High Court, Indian Oil Corporation, Paras 15 & 16, the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Corporation, the Supreme Court, J.M.A. Industries Ltd., the Apex Court, Service Regulation, the Service Rules, the Labour Court, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, Court, -Board, Court, the Gujarat Electricity Board, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Apex Court, the Labour Court, Court, Court, Court, the Labour Court, the Apex Court, Indian Overseas Bank, I.O.B., Canteen Workers' Union, L.&S., the Apex Court, The High Court, the Industrial Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, High Court, Court/Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Learned Advocate, Learned Advocate, Direct Service

DATE: 1995, 3rd March, 2001, date 7th November, 2001, 1947, 1947, 18th November, 1989, November, 1989, 8th December, 1989, 10th January, 1990, 10th January, 1990, 1947, 28th March, 1983, 10th January, 1990, 17th November, 1995, 14, 59, 61, five to six days, 1947, 1947, 1947, 10th January, 1990, 26th December, 1989, 29th December, 1989, 2001, 1999, 1309, 1998, Paras 10, 11, more than 240 days, months, '5, 21st, August, 1981, 7th September, 1981, 8th January, 1982, 1993, 2001, 2272, 1995, 1995, 1995, August, 1998, 2001, 1980, '15, 1980, 21 days, 1993, 20-5-1997, 10th January, 1990, 1947, 1947, 1947, 1947, 2000, 2001, one month, one month

PRODUCT: Para 6(B, Articles 226, Articles 226, Para 10, Para 9, Rule 8 Overstaying, Articles 226, Articles 226

LOC: Exh, Exh

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second, second, first

GPE: India, Sunil, D.K.

WORK_OF_ART: Om Prakash Goel v. Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.

FAC: Sugarbai M. Siddiq

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //