Eli Lilly and Co. (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : Jul-14-2005

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: Section 201(1, Section 201(1A, Section 194C of the Act, Section 194-I of the Act 5.1, Section 194, Clauses 12, Section 194, Section 194-I of the Act, Section 201, the Finance Act, Section 201(1, Section 201(1, Section 194C, Section 194-I of the Act, Section 194-I., Clauses 12, Clauses 15, Clauses 19 and 20, Circular, Section 194, Section 194, Section 194

CARDINAL: 1, 5.2, 715, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5, 5.6, 718, 201(1, 201(1A, 28, 7.4, 201)(1A, 9, 2, 3, 1, 2, twenty thousand, 194, one hundred and twenty thousand, 5, 715, 201(1A

ORG: M/s Eli Lilly &amp, P) Ltd., AO, M/s Eli Lilly Inc., M/s Ranbaxy Ltd., Pharmaceuticals, M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., M/s Centum Pharma Ltd., TDS, TDS, CIT, CBDT, CIT, ELR, CIT, CIT, CIT, CIT, the Hon'ble Privy Council, Indian Radio &, Cable Communications Co. Ltd v., CIT, Reliance, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, CBDT, CIT, Sections, Act.6, Departmental Representative.7.1, Reliance, Reliance, CIT, Madhya Pradesh State Co-operative Development Bank Ltd., CIT, P.V. Rajagopal and Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, the Government of a foreign State, HUF, M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., the Provident Fund, CBDT, CIT, CIT, Sections 201(1

GPE: India, New Delhi, Act.3, Netherlands, India, Nepal, the Republic of India, the Kingdom of Nepal, Md., India, the Republic of India, the Kingdom of Nepal, India, cancelled.14

DATE: May, 2003, the financial year 2001-02.2, annual, annual, Aug., 1995, 1937, Aug., 1995, 2001, June, 2002, 1st June, 2002, 1st June, 2002, the financial year, 13, 16, 1940, Aug., 1995

MONEY: 2.3 per cent, 2,0 per cent, 1.85 per cent, 1.85 per cent, 1.85 per cent, 1.85 per cent

PERSON: Saleem, Md. Ali, M.P. Agro Morarji Fertilizers Ltd., Misc

NORP: Suspense

WORK_OF_ART: The Shops and Establishments Act