Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kottam Raju Vikram Rao Vs. State of Gujarat
Decided On : May-26-1976
Court : Gujarat
LAW: the Indian Explosives Act, the Explosive Substance Act and Section 120B, the Indian Penal Code and Section 121A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 161(3, Section 439, Section 437(3, Section 161(3, Section 162, Section 162(1, Section 161(3, Section 173, Section 161, Section 173, Section 173, Section 173, the Amending Act, Section 173, Section 161, Section 173, Section 173, Section 161, Section 165(5, Section 165, Section 161(3, Section 165(5, Section 165, Section 173(1, Section 165, Section 165, Section 165, Section 165, Section 103, Section 103, Section 102, Section 103, Section 173, Section 161, Section 161, Section 162, Section 162, Section 173, Section 173, Section 173(5, Section 173, Section 161, Section 161, Section 207, Section 161(3, Section 161 or Section 164, Section 161, Section 173(1, Section 161, Section 100, Section 161(3, Section 173(1).14, Section 161(3, Section 437, Section 173(1, Section 164, Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 76, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 74, the Evidence Act, Section 162, Section 210, Section 548, Section 219, Section 162, Section 162, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 125, the Evidence Act, Section 164 of the Code, Section 164, the Evidence Act, Section 164 of the Code, Section 74, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 173(4, Section 76, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 173(4, Section 161, Section 173(1, Section 173, Section 161, Section 173, Section 437 and Section 439 of the Code, Section 16, Section 16-A(9, Central Act No, Section 3, Section 3, Section 497, the Evidence Act, Section 124, Section 161 of the Code, Section 124, the Evidence Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(6, Section 161
PERSON: D.P. Desai, J.1, Chapter XIV, Magistrate, Magistrate, Sed, Muthia Swamiyar, Madras, G. Krishnan, AIR1961Mad92, Lordships, Lordship Chandrachud, J., Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla Criminal, Habeas Corpus, Mehta, Suryaprakasa Rao
ORG: Additional Sessions, the Investigating Agency, Criminal Revision Application, challenged.2, Investigating Agency, Additional Sessions, Court, The Court of Sessions under Section 439, Court, the Investigating Agency, State, the Investigating Agency, State, Court, the Investigating Agency, Slate, Special Public Prosecutor, the Opponent-State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, aYta, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Sessions, I.L.R., a Criminal Court, State, Magistrate, the High Court, Sections 74, Judicial, Division Bench, ILR, Magistrate, the Investigating Agency, Court, Special Public Prosecutor, Court, the Investigating Agency, Court, the Investigating Agency, Court, Court, Court, the Investigating Agency, Court, Additional District Magistrate, Criminal Appeals, Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, The High Court, Sections, Court, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, State, the Nagpur Court, S.V. Inglev v., Court, Special Public Prosecutor, Magistrate, Magistrate, under:173(6, Magistrate, the Investigating Agency, Special Public Prosecutor, Court, the Investigating Agency, Court, Court, Court, Additional Sessions, Additional Sessions, the Investigating Agency
GPE: Baroda, Emperor, kind.16, Clause
CARDINAL: 29, 12, 6, 162, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 5, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3, 1, 3, 102, 103, 4, 2, two, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 1, 165, 1, 3, 30, two, 31).The, 30, 5, 5, 279, 296, 80, 437, 439, 14, 16, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 149
DATE: March 19, 1976, 5, 1973, 1898, 1955, 1955, 1955, 1955, 1955, 1955, 1955, 1955, 76, 1975, 1976, 1971
PRODUCT: a Full Bench, the Full Bench, a Full Bench, the Full Bench
ORDINAL: first, first
WORK_OF_ART: Amending Act No, Amending Act No, The Code of Criminal Procedure
QUANTITY: 1955 Act
LOC: Madras, Madras
FAC: Natha Apparao