Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad Vs. Premchand Mahasukhram, Deceased by His Heirs

Decided On : Apr-29-1964

Court : Gujarat

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Order 41 Rule 23 Civil Procedure Code, Rule 20 Sub-rule, Section 406 of the Act, Section 406 of the Act, Section 2 Sub-section, Section 406(1, Section 86, Section 406 Sub-section, Section 406 of the Act, Article 265 of the Indian Constitution, Section 9, Section 406 Sub-section, Section 9, Section 413, Section 127, Section 99, Section 406, Section 406, Section 406 of the Act, Rule 19, Section 406 of the Act, Section 406 of the Act, Section 406, Section 413, Section 406, Section 406, Section 411, Section 411, Section 453 of the Act, Section 413, Rule 19, Section 413, Section 413, Section 413, Section 413, Section 413, Section 413, Section 413, Section 413 of the Act, Section 413 of the Act, Section 413

PERSON: N.M. Miabhoy, Premchand Mahasukhram, Premchand, Ahmedabad, Plaintiff Premchand, Nos, Schedule, Premchand, Mill, J.C. Shah, Shah J., Ghelabhai Gandhi, Shah J., Justice Shah, Shah Learned Counsel, Dharamdas Vora v., Vakil, the Shah J., Vakil, Vakil, Vakil, Vakil, Shah Learned, Vakil, Vakil, Vakil, Vakil, Willes J., Hawkesford 6 C.B., Vakil, well:-see Hurdutrai, Vakil, Vakil, Firm Seth Radha Kishan, Kishan, Ludhiana, Vakil, Vakil, Vakil, Vakil, Vakil

LOC: J.1, Mills, Mills, the District Judge

CARDINAL: two, 370, 371, 529, 273, one, 273, 78, 529, two, two, three, 981, 2, three, 167, 167, 167, two, 126, 167, 2, 1 258, 1 258, One, two, 1, 29, two, two, two, two, five, two, two, 57, 58, two, two, 65, 1, two, two, two, two, two, two, 336, 356, three, One, two, two, 52, 343, 349, two, two, two, 1963]50ITR93(SC, 324, two, 122, two, 1, two, two, 1964]2SCR273, one, more than one, 49, two, 2, 2, 20, 20, 2, at least twelve hours, 2, 2, 2, 410 411, 413, two thousand, two, 1, 1, two, two, 2, 126, two, two, two, two, two

DATE: 11th of April 1960, 1958, 1958, 1956, 1957, 1960, 1957, 1960, 24th March 1955, the year 1954-55, September 1955, 30th September 1955, 1st of February 1956, 13th of February 1956, 15th of February 1956, 23rd of March 1956, the official year 1954-5, the year 1954-55, February 1956, 13th February 1956, 23rd of March 1956, the financial year 1954-55, the financial year 1954-55, 28th of November 1955, 8th of December 1955, 28th of November 1955, the financial year 1954-55, the financial year 1955-56, 8th of December 1955, 12th of January 1956, the year 1954, 8th of December 1955, 8 December 1955.6, the years 1947-48, 1901, 1925, 1948, recent years, 1551, Each year, the official year, the official year

ORG: District Judge Ahmedabad in Civil Appeals Nos, the High Court, the Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad, Corporation, Civil Suit, the Rustom Jehangir Vakil Mills Company Limited, Civil Suit, the District Court, the High Court, 3rd Joint, Court, Corporation, the Taxation Rules, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act 1949, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Mills, Corporation, Corporation, Mills, Mills, Corporation, Mills, Mills, Mills, Mills, Corporation, Corporation, the Honourable Court, Corporation, Corporation, follows:406, the Court of Small, Corporation, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Bombay High Court, Western India Prospecting Syndicate Limited v., The Municipal Corporation of The City of Ahmedabad Civil Revision Application, Western India Prospecting Syndicate Limited, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Civil Court, the Western India Prospecting Syndicate Limited, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Gopal Mills Co. Ltd., The Broach Borough Municipality, the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, Western India Prospecting Syndicate Limited, the Bombay District Municipal Act, the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, Court, the Bombay High Court, The Poona Municipal Corporation, the Bombay High Court, Schedule, the Civil Court, Corporation, Wolver Hampton New Water Works Co., Corporation, Corporation, C.W.N., Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Firm of llluri Subbayya Chetty, Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Civil Courts, Civil Courts, Corporation, the Civil Court, Civil Court, Corporation, Maxwell, Corporation, Civil Court, Civil Court, Civil Court, Civil Court, Ors, Court, Court, Court, Civil Court, Civil Court, Privy Council, Raleigh Investment Co. Ltd., Corporation, Corporation, the Taxation Rules, Corporation, The Taxation Rules, the Commissioner the Taxation Rules, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, the Taxation Rules, the District Court, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the District Court, the District Court, the Civil Court, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the Civil Court, Legislature, the Civil Court, a Civil Court, a Civil Court, Maxwell, Interpretation of Statutes Eleventh Edition, Court, Civil Court, Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, a Civil Court, a Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Corporation, Court, Corporation, The Civil Court, Corporation, Court, Court, Corporation, Court, the District Court

PRODUCT: 981/2

GPE: the City of Ahmedabad The Municipal Commissioner, Premchand, Premchand, Ahmedabad, Bombay, The Municipality of Ankleshwar v., React, N.S., Clause

ORDINAL: 5th, first, third, second, third, second, third, first, second, first, second, second

PERCENT: 6%, 6%

FAC: the Dudheshwar Road Ahmedabad, Bombay Law Reporter, Bombay Law Reporter, Bombay Law Reporter

NORP: Rules, follows:413, Rules

WORK_OF_ART: 11th Edition of Interpretation of Statutes

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //