ito Vs. Shri Yogi H. Aggarwal, Associated - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Feb-24-2005

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 80L @ Rs, Section 80L, Section 143(1)(a, Under Section 80L, Section 80L of the Act, Section 80L, Section 64(1A, Section 80L, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 80L, the IT Act, Section 64(1A, the Finance Act, the IT Act, the IT Act, Section 64, the IT Act, Section 64(1)(A, the IT Act, Section 64(1A, Section 64(1A, the IT Act, Section 80L, Section 80L, Section 80L, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(3, Section 64 and Clause, Section 10, the I.T. Act, Section 143(3).10, Section 80L of the I.T.Act, the IT Act, Clause, Section 64(1A, Section 64, Section 10 of the Act, the IT Act, the IT Act, Section 64, the Finance Act, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 10, Section 64 of the Act, Section 64, Section 64, Section 10, Section 5 of the I.T.Act, Section 80U, Section 64(1A, the IT Act, Section 80L. Section 80L, Section 80L(1, Section 64, Section 80L, Section 64(1A, Section 80L

CARDINAL: 1, two, 24/6/99, two, 3,000/-, 15,000/-, 30/1/98, 30,000/-, 15,000/-, 30,000/-, 5, two, 24,000/-, 12,000/-, two, two, 24/6/99, 24,000/-, 429, 145, 791, 7, 1/4/93, 1A, 1,500/-, 1,500/-, 1961.9, 14, 429, 1A, 1/4/93, 1.4.93, 1/4/93, 12, 1/4/93, 1A, one thousand five, 13, 636, two, 1/4/93, two, 198, one, one thousand five hundred, 1A, 32, two, 636, 1/4/93, 1A, 80L(1, 16, 1A

GPE: Mumbai, Impugned, Ld, A.O., assessee, Ld, Ld, Assessee, Clause

DATE: the assessment year 1977-98, 1998-99, the assessment year 1997-98, the assessment year 1998-99, the assessment year 1998-99, this year, years, the assessment year 1997-98, the assessment year 1998-99, years, years, 1961, 1992, year 1993-94, 1961, year 1976-77, 1993-94, 32, 1992, Assessment year 1976-77 to 1992-93, 1992, 32, 1961, 1961, 1992, 1992, 1992, para-36, page-31, subsequent years, previous year, 32, 1st April, 1993, year 1993-94, 1/4/93 i.e. assessment year 1993-94, year 1992-93, year, 1993-94

PERSON: Rs, Hon'ble Karnataka High Court, S.K. Nayak, Authorised Representative, S.K. Nayak, w.e.f.1.4.93

ORG: income.4, Assessing, Assessing, S.K. Deb 14 TTJ, ITR, Reliance, Karnataka High Court, CIT, S.K. Deb, TTJ, Bench, Karnataka High Court, Assessing, Section 80U. Provided, CBDT, ITR, CBDT Circular, s/s, Karnataka High Court, S.K. Nayak

WORK_OF_ART: Adjustment Explanatory Sheet

PRODUCT: Shri S.K. Deb v. ITO, Circular