Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

income Tax Officer Vs. Chothmal Idanji

Decided On : Jan-03-2005

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

LAW: Section 143(1, the IT Act, Section 148, Section 147/148 of the Act, Section 143(1, Section 148, Section 148, Section 148

CARDINAL: 1, 1,65,501, 50,000, 1,86,040, two, 1, 2, 50,000, 195

ORG: Department, HUF, Smt, ITO, Department, DVO, Smt, CIT, AO

DATE: 16th Sept., 1998, 1987, 1982-83, 1987-88, 1987, 1961, 26th Aug., 1987.Thereafter, 16th Aug., 1993.Subsequently, 13th March, 1995, Feb., 1995, 31st Jan., 1997, 25th Aug., 1987, 1992

PERSON: Sushila Bai, Sushila Bai, Sardar Kehar Singh v.

GPE: Sumerpur

ORDINAL: 1st

PRODUCT: 769

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //