Mangalsingh Bhansingh Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Decided On : Dec-17-1987

Court : Gujarat

LAW: section 67, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 26, the Evidence Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act Sections 25, Section 25, Section 53 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Section 53(i):The Central Government, Section 53, the Customs Act, Section 9, section 37, the Customs Act, Section 173, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Special Act, Criminal Procedure Code, Section 173, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Chapter XIV, Section 173 of the Code, Section 8(i, section 67, Section 25, the Evidence Act, section 53, Chapter XII, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 154, the Excise Act, Section 154, section 68, Section 157, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 51 of the Act, Chapter XII, Section 53, Section 165 of the Code, Chapter, Section 52 of the Act, Chapter XII, Section 167, Section 173, Section 53 of the Act, Section 9, Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 21, Section 19, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, Section 21, Section 53, Section 21(2, the Central Excises Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 53, Chapter XII, Chapter XII, section 67, section 51 and 52, Chapter XII, Section 53, Chapter XII, Section 167, Chapter XII, the narcotics Act, Section 167 of the Code, the Narcotics Act, Section 51, Section 57 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 167 of the Code, Section 51, Section 167 of the Code, Chapter XII, Chapter XII, the Narcotics Act, Chapter XII, Section 4(2, the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court, Section 53, Chapter XII, Section 180(1)(a, Section 178 of the Code, Chapter XII, Section 173 of the Code

PERSON: Mehta, J.1, Ahmedabad, Nos, Metropolitan Magistrate, Gazette, Gazette, Balkishan A. Devidayal v. State, Jagatsinh S. Sodha v., Anr, Misc, J. P. Desai, J., Misc, Excise Officers, Misc, Balkrishna

ORG: The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Preventive Officer of Central Excise, Headquarters Office, Excise Department, Magistrate, Magistrate, the State Government, Border Security Force, The State Government, the Central Excises & Salt Act, the Railway Property, the Central Excises & Salt Act, the Railway Property, the Supreme Court, Railway Protection Force, Railway Property, Railway Protection Force, the Supreme Court, RPF, Force, Magistrate, The Supreme Court, the Central Excise Department, FIR, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, The Central Excises, Magistrate, Magistrate, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Central Excise, Customs, FIR, Customs, Customs, Customs, the Police Station, Allahabad High Court, Mahesh v. Union of India, LJ, IPC, Allahabad High Court, Allahabad High Court, Court, Coram- A.S. Qureshi, Counsel for the Customs Department, Narcotic Drugs and, the Supreme Court, Court, customs

DATE: 1985, 23-9-1987, 3 about a week, about seven days, 3 to 4 days, 20-9-1987, 1985, 1966, 1973, 90 days, 60 days, 1987, 1-5-1987, 1973, May 6, 1986, 1988, a period of, 90 days, 1986, 1986, three weeks, three weeks, 1980

QUANTITY: 985 grams, 985 grams

CARDINAL: 1, 3, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 5, 16-10-1987.4, 3, 26, 26, 1980CriLJ1424, 26, 158, 5, 2, 154, 157,158, 167, 173, 787, 12, 411, 42(1, 52(3, 53, 2683(B, 4, 10-10-1986

GPE: Bharatji, Hindi, under:21(1):When, Ranjitsingh v. State, evidence.14

NORP: Central Excise, Maharashtra, Narcotics

PRODUCT: Cri LJ 1424