Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mohanlal Maganla Thakkar Vs. State of Gujarat

Decided On : Apr-19-1965

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Article 134(1)(C, Article 36 of the Letters Patent, Article 134 of the Constitution?'Article 134(1)(C, the Criminal Procedure Code, Constitution, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 476, Section 200, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 134(1, Article 134 of the Constitution of India, Article 134(1)(c, Article if the other, Article

ORG: this Criminal Application, Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, S. 114, the Court of Sessions, Judicial Magistrate, Extra Additional Sessions, Court, S. 114 I.P.C., Magistrate, S. 114, Criminal Revision Application, the High Court, Court, Criminal Application, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Criminal Revision Application, Court, Court, that:'In, the English Courts, Court, Court, Court, Salaman, Warner, the Bihar Sales Tax Act, the Board of Revenue, the High Court, the Supreme Court, SCR, AIR, under:'In, the High Court, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, The Board of Revenue, the High Court, Board, the High Court, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, Jethan, Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1961, SC, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Criminal Court, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, a High Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, S. 476, S. 476, Court, S. 476, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, S. 476, Court, S. 114 I.P.C., Court, Legislature, Criminal Court, S. 476 Criminal Procedure Code, Court, Amand v. Home, Royal Netherlands Government, the House of Lords, Court, an English Court, Magistrates, the High Court, Magistrate, S. 476, the High Court, Court, S. 476, Court, Magistrate, Extra Additional Sessions, the High Court, the High Court, Raju, Court

GPE: Baroda, Baroda, Baroda, Baroda, India, Halsbury, India, Premchand v. State of Bihar, Bihar, Art, Art, Art, India

CARDINAL: two, two, one, two, two, 467, 467, 378, two, 2., 3., 4., 378, 740, 743, 1, 735, one, 804, 15, 133, 133(1)(C, 133.'In, 1, 2, 3, 476A, 476A, one, 23, 162, 164, one

DATE: 1964, January 11, 1964, 22, 1891, 1951]19ITR108(SC, S. 195(1)(B, 1590, 1943, January, 11, 1965, January 11, 1965

PERSON: Divan J., Art, hearing:'When, Raju J., V.M. Abdul Rahman v., D.K. Cassim, Esher, XXXV, Magistrate, Magistrate, S. 476-B, S. 476B, A.W. Meads v. Emperor, Military Law, Viscount, Wright, Porter that:'This

ORDINAL: third, firstly, secondly, second, First

FAC: the Bihar Sales Tax Act

WORK_OF_ART: English Dictionary

EVENT: AC 147

LANGUAGE: English, English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //